Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2017
Merged

Update README.md #28

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2017

Conversation

eugene-nikolaev
Copy link
Contributor

Bump jpeek version to 0.5 at jar link and launch command.

Bump jpeek version to 0.5 at jar link and launch command
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Oct 27, 2017

@yegor256 please, pay attention to this pull request

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Oct 27, 2017

Job gh:yegor256/jpeek#28 is in scope.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #28 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #28   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     93.48%   93.48%           
  Complexity      101      101           
=========================================
  Files            12       12           
  Lines           384      384           
  Branches         44       44           
=========================================
  Hits            359      359           
  Misses           16       16           
  Partials          9        9

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7325985...17d516d. Read the comment docs.

@yegor256 yegor256 merged commit bc6709b into cqfn:master Oct 27, 2017
@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@eugene-nikolaev thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants