Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug fix in document #2370

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2025
Merged

Bug fix in document #2370

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2025

Conversation

viveksoundrapandi
Copy link
Contributor

A bug is in the document, where the wirte section task method is not invoked before passing on to context. This results in an error as expectaion in utlitities is a dict but a function gets passed.

this is discussed clearly here: https://community.crewai.com/t/attribute-error-str-object-has-no-attribute-get/1079/16

A bug is in the document, where the wirte section task method is not invoked before passing on to context. This results in an error as expectaion in utlitities is a dict but a function gets passed.

this is discussed clearly here: https://community.crewai.com/t/attribute-error-str-object-has-no-attribute-get/1079/16
@joaomdmoura
Copy link
Collaborator

Disclaimer: This review was made by a crew of AI Agents.

Code Review for PR #2370

Overview

The patch effectively addresses a bug within the documentation related to the invocation of the write_section_task method, which was incorrectly passed as a context without being executed. This change resolves a type mismatch error that led to an AttributeError.

Files Modified

  • docs/guides/flows/first-flow.mdx

Issues Identified

1. Method Invocation Bug

Location: Line 232-235
Issue: The write_section_task method was incorrectly passed as a reference instead of being invoked in the task context.
Impact: This resulted in an AttributeError since the implementation expected a dictionary but received a function reference instead.

Original Code:

return Task(
    config=self.tasks_config['review_section_task'],
    context=[self.write_section_task]
)

Fixed Code:

return Task(
    config=self.tasks_config['review_section_task'],
    context=[self.write_section_task()]
)

Discussion: This issue was highlighted in community discussions, indicating a recognized problem that prompted this fix.

2. Documentation Clarity

While the corrective change rectifies the immediate issue, the documentation would benefit from enhanced clarity surrounding task context handling.

Improvement Suggestions

1. Add Explanatory Comment

To make the code clearer, consider adding an explanatory comment:

return Task(
    config=self.tasks_config['review_section_task'],
    # Task context requires executed task results, not method references
    context=[self.write_section_task()]
)

2. Introduce Type Hints

Maintaining clarity in the expected types can be improved with type hints:

from typing import List, Dict

@crew
def review_section_task(self) -> Task:
    return Task(
        config=self.tasks_config['review_section_task'],
        context: List[Dict] = [self.write_section_task()]
    )

3. Implement Error Handling

Adding validations can enforce that context is formatted correctly:

@crew
def review_section_task(self) -> Task:
    task_result = self.write_section_task()
    if not isinstance(task_result, dict):
        raise TypeError("Task context must be a dictionary")
    
    return Task(
        config=self.tasks_config['review_section_task'],
        context=[task_result]
    )

Additional Recommendations

  1. Documentation Update: Incorporate a note in the documentation that emphasizes the importance of executing task methods when passing them as context.
  2. Unit Tests: Adding unit tests would help verify the handling of task context and mitigate any similar issues in future implementations.
  3. Enhanced Error Messages: Consider improving error messages to provide clearer indications when task context is improperly formatted.

Conclusion

The corrections successfully resolve the identified bug by ensuring the task method is properly invoked. While the changes are minimal, they play a crucial role in maintaining functionality. The proposed improvements would bolster code robustness and enhance user guidance in utilizing the framework effectively.

Next Steps

  1. ✅ Merge the current fix to address the immediate issue it resolves.
  2. Evaluate the implementation of suggested improvements in a follow-up PR.
  3. Update documentation sections to prevent similar misunderstandings in the future.

This fix aligns seamlessly with the issues discussed in the community and will likely resolve the AttributeError faced by users.

@joaomdmoura joaomdmoura merged commit 939afd5 into crewAIInc:main Mar 14, 2025
@joaomdmoura
Copy link
Collaborator

Great catch

@viveksoundrapandi viveksoundrapandi deleted the patch-1 branch March 14, 2025 08:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants