Docs/1.1.2 changelog #1060
Merged
Docs/1.1.2 changelog #1060
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
michalbiesek
reviewed
Aug 5, 2022
jrcheli
reviewed
Aug 5, 2022
|
I've done the best I could with your feedback. Will revise Monday if we need to. Thanks again! |
michalbiesek
reviewed
Aug 8, 2022
website/src/pages/docs/changelog.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - [#1025](https://github.com/criblio/appscope/issues/1025) The process start message (the [start.msg](schema-reference#eventstartmsg) event) now includes a total of four identifiers. By itself, the new **UUID** process ID is unique for a given machine. In principle, **UUID** together with the new **Machine ID** constitutes a tuple ID that is unique across all machine namespaces. Here's a summary of the IDs available in AppScope 1.1.2: | ||
| - **UUID** (new in AppScope 1.1.2), with key `uuid` and a value in [canonical UUID form](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier). UUID is a universally-unique process identifier, meaning that no two processes will ever have the same UUID value on the same machine. | ||
| - **Machine ID** (new in AppScope 1.1.2), with key `machine_id` and a value that AppScope obtains from `/etc/machine-id`. The machine ID uniquely identifies the host, as described in the [man page](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/machine-id.5.html). When `/etc/machine-id` is not available (e.g., in Alpine, or in a container), AppScope generates the machine ID using a repeatable MD5 hash of the host's first MAC address. Two containers on the same host can have the same machine ID. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
small nit: redundant space here:
from `/etc/machine-id`. The machine ID uniquely identifies the host
It can looks like:
from `/etc/machine-id`. The machine ID uniquely identifies the host
@abetones Besides the above, Pull Request looks good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for catching that, @michalbiesek !
|
Looks great to me! Thanks @abetones! Merging! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Besides the Changelog, there's one new sentence about
scope servicein the use cases page.