Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cscli metrics: rename buckets -> scenarios #2848

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024
Merged

cscli metrics: rename buckets -> scenarios #2848

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024

Conversation

mmetc
Copy link
Contributor

@mmetc mmetc commented Feb 15, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

@mmetc: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.

  • /kind feature
  • /kind enhancement
  • /kind fix
  • /kind chore
  • /kind dependencies
Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

Copy link

@mmetc: There are no area labels on this PR. You can add as many areas as you see fit.

  • /area agent
  • /area local-api
  • /area cscli
  • /area appsec
  • /area security
  • /area configuration
Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

@mmetc mmetc added this to the 1.6.1 milestone Feb 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 9 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (717fc97) 57.88% compared to head (8a35f78) 57.92%.

Files Patch % Lines
cmd/crowdsec-cli/metrics_table.go 33.33% 8 Missing ⚠️
cmd/crowdsec-cli/metrics.go 88.88% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2848      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   57.88%   57.92%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         239      239              
  Lines       30993    31005      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        17941    17961      +20     
+ Misses      11415    11411       -4     
+ Partials     1637     1633       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
bats 37.85% <57.14%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
unit-linux 52.36% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unit-windows 47.82% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@LaurenceJJones LaurenceJJones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it say lines poured to scenario?

│             Source             │ Lines read │ Lines parsed │ Lines unparsed │ Lines poured to bucket │ Lines whitelisted │
├────────────────────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────────────┼───────────────────┤
│ file:/var/log/nginx/access.log │ 5          │ 5            │ -              │ -                      │ 5                 │
╰────────────────────────────────┴────────────┴──────────────┴────────────────┴────────────────────────┴───────────────────╯

@mmetc
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmetc commented Feb 15, 2024

Should it say lines poured to scenario?

│             Source             │ Lines read │ Lines parsed │ Lines unparsed │ Lines poured to bucket │ Lines whitelisted │
├────────────────────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────────────┼───────────────────┤
│ file:/var/log/nginx/access.log │ 5          │ 5            │ -              │ -                      │ 5                 │
╰────────────────────────────────┴────────────┴──────────────┴────────────────┴────────────────────────┴───────────────────╯

IMHO no, the sentence would not make sense.
Anyway the most important is the name in "metrics list" because it can go in scripts, we can change the others as needed.

@mmetc mmetc merged commit e976614 into master Feb 15, 2024
17 checks passed
@mmetc mmetc deleted the rename-metrics branch February 15, 2024 13:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/cscli kind/enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants