fix: staking cache to in-memory KV store

[randy-cro]

Description

This PR fixes inconsistencies in the staking cache (originally implemented in PR #1725) across different nodes.
Previously, simulation or optimistic execution contexts did not properly handle discarded changes, which could lead to duplicate or incorrect cache data, eventually causing apphash mismatches and halting the chain.

The primary change refactors the cache to use an in-memory KV store.
With this approach, when a context is discarded, the cache is automatically rolled back, just like any other store in the system.

This ensures that cache state remains consistent with the underlying store, even during simulations or optimistic execution scenarios.

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• run make lint and make test
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[JayT106]

LGTM, but the log info and level should be refined and simplified, more of it should put it into debug level. Some logs are using error level which the code section doesn't handle the error case.

[randy-cro]

Member

@songgaoye it is here, did u miss it?