Avoid identifier naming collision in getter
, setter
, and property
macros
#15239
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TL;DR
Currently, you can't refer to an identifier called
value
inside agetter
,setter
, andproperty
blocks due to that identifier colliding with one defined inside the macro. This commit uses a safe variable name to avoid that collision.Details
Given the following code:
I get this error:
This didn't make sense because my
value
method is guaranteed to return aString
at compile time. One thing I noticed was that changing thegetter baz
block toself.value.upcase
worked, which pointed to a naming collision.I did find local variables named
value
in those macros, and this PR updates them with the%
sigil. With this PR, that example code runs as expected.