Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor EOS fs #830

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 11, 2020
Merged

Refactor EOS fs #830

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 11, 2020

Conversation

ishank011
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ishank011 ishank011 requested a review from labkode as a code owner June 11, 2020 15:32
@labkode
Copy link
Member

labkode commented Jun 11, 2020

@ishank011 ready for review?

@ishank011
Copy link
Contributor Author

@labkode Yep.

var hiddenReg = regexp.MustCompile(`\.sys\..#.`)

// Config holds the configuration details for the EOS fs.
type Config struct {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this be somehow re-used?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ishank011 ishank011 Jun 11, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we can use only a single config in utils/eosfs/eosfs.go, but I wanted to keep it separately in eos and eoshome so that it can be picked up by cato. Since both of them have a difference in their configs, using a common config will not be reflected in the documentation.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay

@labkode labkode merged commit 27831de into cs3org:master Jun 11, 2020
@ishank011 ishank011 deleted the eosfs-refactor branch June 12, 2020 08:29
C0rby pushed a commit to owncloud/reva that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants