allow fetching of articles that a group has published #377
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It seems that I need to fix tests :) I will later |
|
I do not see a reason for the schema change, no. But it might just have been caused by changes in a recent dependency update, the changes to it look unrelated to yours. |
|
schema changes are explained by #393 (comment) |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #377 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 99.92% 99.92%
========================================
Files 203 203
Lines 2707 2709 +2
========================================
+ Hits 2705 2707 +2
Misses 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
add an attribute to the goup model, allowing the articles of a group to be retrieved via that group's model.
@wilco375 please let me know if the schema looks right to you, I'm not sure why these changes happened (the underlying tables should not be changed by my additions right?)