Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX-2: correct minor errors based on Code Review AI feedback #6

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

NickAnderegg
Copy link
Collaborator

This Pull Request shows further feedback on only the changes created in response to previous feedback.

@NickAnderegg NickAnderegg added the CTO.ai Review Automated CTO.ai bot code review label Apr 25, 2024
@@ -229,6 +226,7 @@ function getWeather(lat, lon, timezone) {

weatherReq.on('error', (e) => {
console.error(`problem with request: ${e.message}`)
reject(e)
})

weatherReq.end()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This patch appears to mostly involve cleaning up certain areas of the code and does not significantly change any functionality. Although only minor changes were made, three potential issues come to mind:

  1. The require statement for node:http was corrected to http. This could potentially be a problem if http is not a dependency in the project, leading to missing module errors. Alternatively, it could have been an intended usage to use a specific version of http under node:http, now changed unintentionally. This should be confirmed.

  2. The removal of comments that were evidently used for debugging has made the code cleaner, but may eliminate helpful context for future developers working on this codebase. It may be worth considering leaving some essential debug logs as commented lines in case they're needed again in the future.

  3. An error handler was added to the 'error' event listener for 'weatherReq'. If the promise returned by the 'getWeather' function is being used elsewhere in the code without error handling logic (i.e., .catch() or a try/catch surrounding an await), this newly introduced reject(e) could lead to unhandled promise rejection warnings if an error occurs. The existing caller code needs to implement error handling properly to prevent this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CTO.ai Review Automated CTO.ai bot code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant