Use new proposed structure for gems by bundler

[maxmeyer]

Summary

When creating new gems with bundler it uses exec for executable files and bin for helper executables local to the project.

Details

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

• I've added tests for my code
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.

[mvz]

I thought it used exe, not exec? (I don't really see the point of this new schema by the way.)

[olleolleolle]

@mvz One reason I can see would be people wanting bin/ to contain only binstubs and such. If that were the case, all of bin/ could be git-ignored. If that's ignored, then exe could contain the executables that are to be exposed to users (as annotated in the gemspec).

Your mileage may vary.

[mvz]

Ah, so binstubs put stuff in bin/ instead of script/, so stuff from script/ was moved to bin/, causing stuff from bin/ to need to move to exe/. That kind of makes sense.