Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Travis: use jruby-9.1.10.0 #1114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2017
Merged

Travis: use jruby-9.1.10.0 #1114

merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2017

Conversation

olleolleolle
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates the CI matrix to use latest JRuby.

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ matrix:
- rvm: 2.3.4
- rvm: 2.2
- rvm: 2.1
- rvm: jruby-9.1.8.0
- rvm: jruby-9.1.10.0
env:
Copy link
Member

@nodo nodo May 26, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @olleolleolle, what about adding jruby-9.1 instead? So we can keep track of the latest major version?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nodo If that would work, which it does not, that would be cool.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, that is unfortunate. Anyway, thanks for the PR, looks good to me! Possibly we can keep track of jruby head if it adds value.

@nodo nodo merged commit b0d88e9 into cucumber:master May 26, 2017
@olleolleolle olleolleolle deleted the patch-1 branch July 10, 2017 15:53
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 25, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 25, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants