Release v2.22.0 #8678
Merged
Release v2.22.0 #8678
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![cvat-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/406724?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> Added ability to hide a mask during editing  ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Added the ability to hide edited objects in the canvas configuration. - Enhanced drawing functionality with visibility controls for shapes. - Introduced new methods for managing the state of edited annotations. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved handling of drawing actions based on visibility states. - **Documentation** - Updated interfaces and action types to reflect new features and state management capabilities. - **Chores** - Refined component logic to support new visibility state management. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Boris Sekachev <boris.sekachev@yandex.ru>
It is not used for anything
Make the Black workflow just run black with default settings. Instead of including specific directories, exclude the ones that haven't been blackened yet via `pyproject.toml`. Leave a few small files out of the exclusion list; blacken them instead. This is one step towards project-wide code formatting. It also makes it easier to format your entire patch when you touch multiple components, since you don't have to remember which directories to apply `black` to.
Update develop after v2.21.3
Since we just dropped support for Python 3.8, we don't need to keep using the old imports anymore. This patch was produced by `ruff check --select=UP006,UP035 --target-version=py39 --fix --unsafe-fixes` (with a couple of manual fixes where ruff coudn't do it by itself). I'd like to apply this across the entire codebase, but since it produces a large amount of churn, I'd rather do it piecemeal. In particular, the SDK contains generated code with `typing` imports, but since I can't fix that automatically, I'm going to delay it until another PR.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> Newly introduced `random_per_job` option for frame selection method doesnt work properly on create job page. This patch fixes it. Resolve #8599 ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Enhanced job initialization flexibility by allowing optional properties. - Improved job creation process with structured handling of job data. - **Bug Fixes** - Adjusted loading spinner display logic for better user feedback during task fetching. - **Documentation** - Updated copyright notice to reflect the year 2024. - **Style** - Standardized property naming conventions across job-related interfaces for clarity. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
The main goal for this refactoring is to co-locate all code responsible for each command. Currently, such code is spread across 3 places: * parser configuration in `parser.py`; * implementation in `cli.py`; * name-to-code mapping in `__main__.py`. This patch combines all three aspects of each command in a single class following a common protocol. This makes it easier to add/modify commands. In addition, I made the following changes: * Moved most code into an `_internal` package, to discourage external code from using it. * Split off some code into dedicated modules. * Added a `CommandGroup` class that itself implements the `Command` protocol. This makes it possible to implement command hierarchies in the future. * Redid the somewhat hacky way in which the code determined which options to pass to the command implementation. Now we pop all common options when we process them, which means all remaining options belong to the command. I had to mark some of the `create` options with `default=argparse.SUPPRESS` to make this work. * Replaced the descriptions for some of the commands with the docstring of the implementation functions, which had more details. Removed the docstrings themselves, which were redundant. * Removed the `RawTextHelpFormatter` from the `create` argument parser, to ensure consistent help formatting between commands. Adjusted the `--filename_pattern` option description to compensate. * Cleaned up the signatures of implementation functions: made all parameters except the client kw-only, removed default values (which would never be used), removed parameters that didn't correspond to any command-line options, fixed some parameter types. Other than the command description updates, none of the changes here should affect the external behavior of the CLI.
This is a continuation of #8626.
This is a continuation of #8626.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> The test can fail sometimes because of the random endpoint behavior (this is by design). Allow some flexibility in expected cases ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes - [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [ ] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Improved reliability of REST API tests related to task management by adding a retry mechanism for random outcomes. - **Tests** - Introduced a new constant to manage random test attempts, enhancing the robustness of specific test cases. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> Test and docs for #8554 ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md -->~~ - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - [x] I have added tests to cover my changes - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Tests** - Introduced a new test case to verify the functionality of hiding and showing masks through both button clicks and keyboard shortcuts. - Enhanced the test suite with comprehensive checks for the hide mask feature, ensuring expected behavior during UI interactions and editing. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Boris Sekachev <boris.sekachev@yandex.ru>
And also `abstractstaticmethod`, which was deprecated in 3.3. This is a continuation of #8626.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> The current approach results in strange version dynamics when making patch releases, where the version number first goes down, then up again. With this change, the version number will never go down. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment~~ <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Refactor** - Updated the version update strategy in release workflow to bump the patch version instead of the minor version. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> Co-authored-by: Nikita Manovich <nikita@cvat.ai> Co-authored-by: Andrey Zhavoronkov <andrey@cvat.ai>
In `cvat-ui/src/index.html`, the meta element seems useless (the default is already to index and follow; I'm not even sure `index` and `follow` are valid values). So just remove it entirely.
…#8634) In some cases point groups do not represent a single object or a bounding box attached to the group does not represent the object. A new quality check option is added for such cases. The new option allows to control whether to use the bbox for point group comparisons or not. - Added a new quality setting to enable or disable using of group bbox for point group comparisons - Improved OKS sigma description
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> By design the server returns a progress value in `0..1` format. But for users its better to be displayed as `0...100%` value. Resolved #8489 ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced progress percentage calculation in the RequestCard component to handle null or undefined values. - Improved formatting of the displayed progress percentage based on request status. - **Bug Fixes** - Fixed potential errors in progress calculation by ensuring a default value is assigned when necessary. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> The `notifications` queue is used very rarely (and not at all in the OSS version), so it doesn't make sense to keep a dedicated worker just for it. Combining the two workers in the utils container saves memory and startup time. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Consolidated notification and cleaning functionalities into a single worker program for improved efficiency. - Updated command for the worker to include cleaning functionality. - Adjusted environment variable to reflect the new worker configuration. - **Bug Fixes** - Removed redundant worker program to streamline operations. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> Depends on #8634 Added a quality check option to consider frames matching, if both GT and job annotations have no annotations on a frame. This affects quality metrics and total counts in reports, but confusion matrices stay unchanged. This allows to use both positive and negative validation frames. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> Unit tests ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes - [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [ ] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a quality setting for comparing point groups without bounding boxes. - Added an option to consider empty frames as matching in quality checks. - Enhanced quality settings form with new options for `matchEmptyFrames` and `useBboxSizeForPoints`. - **Bug Fixes** - Corrected property name from `peoject_id` to `project_id` in the API quality reports filter. - **Documentation** - Updated API schemas to include new quality settings properties. These changes improve the flexibility and accuracy of quality assessments within the application. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
cvat-bot
bot
requested review from
azhavoro,
zhiltsov-max,
bsekachev,
SpecLad,
Marishka17 and
nmanovic
as code owners
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8678 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.32% 74.19% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 401 401
Lines 43319 43502 +183
Branches 3925 3950 +25
==========================================
+ Hits 32197 32276 +79
- Misses 11122 11226 +104
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added
Feature to hide a mask during editing (Hide mask during editing #8554)
A quality setting to compare point groups without using bbox (Add a quality setting for avoiding using bbox in point group matching #8634)
A quality check option to consider empty frames matching (Allow matching empty frames in quality checks #8652)
Changed
Removed
Fixed
Propagation creates copies on non-existing frames in a ground truth job (Fixed propagate in ground truth tasks with sparsed frames #8550)
Exporting projects with tasks containing honeypots. Honeypots are no longer exported. (Fix exporting projects with honeypots #8597)
Error after creating GT job on Create job page with frame selection method
random_per_job(Fixrandom_per_joboption on create job page #8623)Fixed issue 'Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'push')' (Fixed: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'push') #8648)
Re-newed import/export request failed immediately if the previous failed (Fixed: Re-newed import/export request failed immediately if the previous failed #8649)
Fixed automatic zooming in attribute annotation mode for masks (Fixed automatic zooming in attribute annotation mode for masks #8657)
Export dataset in CVAT format misses frames in tasks with non-default frame step (Export dataset in CVAT format misses frames in tasks with non-default… #8662)
Incorrect progress representation on
Requestspage (Fix: Progress on Requets page is displayed as0..1#8668)