Proposal for changes to the config files #78
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hjoliver
reviewed
Jan 31, 2020
hjoliver
reviewed
Jan 31, 2020
wxtim
reviewed
Jan 31, 2020
wxtim
reviewed
Jan 31, 2020
wxtim
reviewed
Jan 31, 2020
wxtim
reviewed
Jan 31, 2020
wxtim
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2020
hjoliver
force-pushed
the
master
branch
3 times, most recently
from
bb1da53 to
8d03fb0
Compare
hjoliver
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2020
|
FYI: The Scheduler already "unifies" the workflow and global configurations for all settings in the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses cylc/cylc-flow#3422.
Intended for discussion at the workshop.
I've attempted to go through all the previous discussion and list everything that was proposed.
Hopefully we can agree which changes are worthwhile and then implement them incrementally.
Many of the changes appeared to have general support in the previous discussions which I've referenced so hopefully we won't need to debate them all in detail.
Reviewers: please just check that nothing obvious is missing or wrong.