Remove packageRules from renovatebot

[jennifer-shehane]

As much as I liked packageRules grouping in theory, in practice it is impractical for a few reasons:

• We don't utilize the scheduling like we imagined and have sinse moved to the giant renovatebot issue - so everything is triggered manually. This means the grouping of 'important' packages over others in scheduling does not even matter.
• Merging in our own packages is actually more difficult, so we end up not updating the most important packages. See the PR below, because it's trying to update 3 breaking change versions of 3 packages at once, it's more difficult to review which package broke the tests so we ignore it. fix(deps): update dependency @cypress/browserify-preprocessor to version .x 🌟 (major) - autoclosed #5396
  
• I did end up leaving the 'types' group cause...it is a lot of deps and arguably less important to upgrade urgently, but I updated the matching to be @types/ since the previous matcher was also grabbing all PRs from @typescript
  

[cypress-bot]

Thanks for the contribution! Below are some guidelines Cypress uses when doing PR reviews.

• Please write [WIP] in the title of your Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review - someone will review your PR as soon as the [WIP] is removed.
• Please familiarize yourself with the PR Review Checklist and feel free to make updates on your PR based on these guidelines.

PR Review Checklist

If any of the following requirements can't be met, leave a comment in the review selecting 'Request changes', otherwise 'Approve'.

User Experience

• The feature/bugfix is self-documenting from within the product.
• The change provides the end user with a way to fix their problem (no dead ends).

Functionality

• The code works and performs its intended function with the correct logic.
• Performance has been factored in (for example, the code cleans up after itself to not cause memory leaks).
• The code guards against edge cases and invalid input and has tests to cover it.

Maintainability

• The code is readable (too many nested 'if's are a bad sign).
• Names used for variables, methods, etc, clearly describe their function.
• The code is easy to understood and there are relevant comments explaining.
• New algorithms are documented in the code with link(s) to external docs (flowcharts, w3c, chrome, firefox).
• There are comments containing link(s) to the addressed issue (in tests and code).

Quality

• The change does not reimplement code.
• There's not a module from the ecosystem that should be used instead.
• There is no redundant or duplicate code.
• There are no irrelevant comments left in the code.
• Tests are testing the code’s intended functionality in the best way possible.

Internal

• The original issue has been tagged with a release in ZenHub.

[cypress]

---

Test summary

3584 • 0 • 47 • 0

---

Run details

Project	cypress
Status	Passed
Commit	7a03880
Started	Dec 17, 2019 8:27 AM
Ended	Dec 17, 2019 8:32 AM
Duration	05:17 💡
OS	Linux Debian - 9.11
Browser	Multiple

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️

---

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

[bahmutov]

ok, see what you mean with grouping