forall statement ensures clauses are missing well-formedness checks #2605
Labels
kind: bug
Crashes, unsoundness, incorrect output, etc. If possible, add a `part:` label
part: verifier
Translation from Dafny to Boogie (translator)
The expression in the
ensures
clause of the followingforall
statement is not well-formed:Alas, this well-formedness check is missing, so Dafny currently accepts (and verifies) the method above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: