Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Type Parameters in Automatically Generated Tests #2227
Type Parameters in Automatically Generated Tests #2227
Changes from all commits
040fd81
fc20ef0
ebdc8e8
2096879
42c274a
cc39149
45fe44f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please explain me why datatypes are not supported? What was happening before?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have code that supports algebraic datatypes on my fork and can make another PR to add them but for know I just wanted to make it easier for a potential user to figure out why test generation might not work for them. Let me know if I should remove this case from this PR / make another PR specifically for datatypes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To answer your second question, datatypes were never supported (as per this README) and would potentially lead to unspecified behavior. Now the behavior is specified even though the support is not there yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok thanks, It's ok to keep this case in this PR I think. I'm happy to have a look at your other PR about datatypes.