-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
removed emptyString and its remaining usage
#7296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
5c240c0 to
5ebf215
Compare
6d5b102 to
9dc139b
Compare
c0bc1e9 to
2064919
Compare
bf04e79 to
cd074a9
Compare
|
#7772 addresses part of the regression. The rest seems mostly stemming from the default parameters for |
cd074a9 to
22cda74
Compare
9bf8161 to
f2458aa
Compare
|
#7813 added more mitigations for the regressions from this change. But I still see a minor regression I need to look into. |
f2458aa to
305403b
Compare
812cbf1 to
ad89c58
Compare
|
The remaining regression just seems to be related to slight differences in the determined Ir count for very hot calls. I see no increase in calls. |
ad89c58 to
40c6ac1
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we had emptyString for performance reasons.. so how much has it slowed down?
If you read my comments above you will see that I addressed the regressions it caused and that it hasn't slowed down. |



No description provided.