Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚥 docs: fixed Traefik web layout #2305

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ventz
Copy link
Contributor

@ventz ventz commented Apr 4, 2024

Fixed Traefik config for broken web rending

Pull Request Template

⚠️ Before Submitting a PR, read the Contributing Docs in full!

Summary

Fixed Traefik config YAML formatting for a broken web config. Also, the previous did not work as a paste due to YAML spacing.

See current: https://docs.librechat.ai/deployment/traefik.html#configure-traefik-and-librechat

Change Type

Please delete any irrelevant options.

  • Documentation update

Testing

Please describe your test process and include instructions so that we can reproduce your test. If there are any important variables for your testing configuration, list them here.

MD rendering seems correct now, including in GitHub Preview.
Traefik config was pulled from my working system.

Test Configuration:

Checklist

Please delete any irrelevant options.

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made pertinent documentation changes
  • My changes do not introduce new warnings
  • New documents have been locally validated with mkdocs

Fixed Traefik config for broken web rending
@danny-avila danny-avila changed the title Fixed Traefik config for broken web rending 🚥 docs: fixed Traefik web layout Apr 4, 2024
@danny-avila
Copy link
Owner

thanks!

@danny-avila danny-avila merged commit 94950b6 into danny-avila:main Apr 4, 2024
kenshinsamue pushed a commit to intelequia/LibreChat that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
Fixed Traefik config for broken web rending
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants