Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 20, 2024. It is now read-only.

add a benchmark travis bot #670

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2017
Merged

add a benchmark travis bot #670

merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2017

Conversation

devoncarew
Copy link
Contributor

@pq

We may want to follow this up by selecting a much larger codebase to benchmark against (as well as ensure that all lints are running?).

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 96.173% when pulling 04f81c8 on benchmark into bb3e7d0 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 96.173% when pulling 88e1c33 on benchmark into bb3e7d0 on master.

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented May 19, 2017

We may want to follow this up by selecting a much larger codebase to benchmark against

👍

(as well as ensure that all lints are running?).

I've got an idea for that and will take over once this is merged.

Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@pq pq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks a million!

return new _Stat(t, timers[t].elapsedMilliseconds);
}).toList();
timings.sort();
for (_Stat stat in timings) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is changing behavior, we should add something to the CHANGELOG. (I'll take care of that 👍 )

@pq pq merged commit d9ddbf1 into master May 19, 2017
@pq pq deleted the benchmark branch June 28, 2017 16:49
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants