Skip to content

Accessors should never be canonical #2396

New issue
New issue
Open
Open
Accessors should never be canonical#2396
Labels
P2A bug or feature request we're likely to work ontype-tech-debtIssues that slow or block desirable development paths for Dartdoc, or create such problems for users
@jcollins-g

Description

@jcollins-g
jcollins-g
opened on Oct 19, 2020

Accessors should not be canonical since they aren't ever documented separately from their enclosing combos (TopLevelVariable or Field). They're currently allowed to be canonical for historical reasons. A cleanup will make fixing lookups easier.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    P2A bug or feature request we're likely to work ontype-tech-debtIssues that slow or block desirable development paths for Dartdoc, or create such problems for users

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions