Spec oversights 1

[DartBot]

This issue was originally filed by edsr...@gmail.com

---

I noticed these minor issues while reading through the spec.

Section 6.2
The formalParameterList grammar is missing a quote around the comma.

Section 7.1.2
The list of operators which must have 1 formal parameter mentions "?", but does not mention "/". I suspect somebody was accidentally pressing shift.

The last paragraph on page 15 does not mention "/" or "?" as an allowed user-defined operator.

Section 10.27
incrementOperator grammar has "–" (an en dash) when it's probably supposed to be "--"

Section 14.1.1
"is" is not listed as a reserved word. This might be intentional since it is listed as a built-in identifier in section 10.29, but for all practical purposes it seems to be a reserved word.

For example, I can't create a variable named "is", while I can create one named "class".

[DartBot]

This comment was originally written by drfibonacci@google.com

---

Set owner to @gbracha.
Added Area-Language, Triaged labels.

[gbracha]

The typos are now fixed and will materialize in the next rev of the spec, which won't be long.

As for what "is" is (to quite Bill Gates): it is not a reserved word; if the implementation doesn't allow it, please file a bug.

---

Added Done label.
Changed the title to: "Spec oversights 1".