No license information in repo

[flore2003]

There is no license information available in the repository, yet it is published under the Apache 2.0 license on Maven.
Which license is applicable to this repository?

[darylteo]

Hi Florian,

Apologies I was really new to the whole thing about licenses and I had just
used a template for the artifacts when I uploaded them. My official stance
is to use the code for whatever purpose you see fit, and there is no
license attached.

Sorry for the inconvenience. I am no longer maintaining this repository as
I've moved on to other work but I hope it is useful to you in some way.
Personally I feel that vanilla rxjava already provides more powerful
constructs over promises that there really is no use for it.

Regards,
Daryl
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:02 AM Florian Reifschneider <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

There is no license information available in the repository, yet it is
published under the Apache 20 license on Maven
Which license is applicable to this repository?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16.