-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
merge bitcoin 15746, 16240, 17192, 17318, 17809, 18098, 18444, 18607, 19100, 19386: rpc backports #4708
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK for merging via merge commit
032a05a
to
f76b2b0
Compare
uhh lol, that's a lot bigger of a PR now 😂 |
603e7e4
to
8a173fb
Compare
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
…Arrays and Objects in RPCResult
…letIsAvailable functions
…d ones (server)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK for merging via merge commit
Is there a reason why 16240 and 19386 (should be marked partial btw) are incomplete? |
16240 was marked as partial as b6fb617 was excluded as this PR favours logical backports as it is a dependency for two other PRs and a complete backport would invite a lot of potential merge conflicts (19250 needed me to resolve conflicts multiple times, for instance) The same applies for 19386's fa7592b. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No description provided.