Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: restore non-depends build documentation #5345

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
May 29, 2023

Conversation

kwvg
Copy link
Collaborator

@kwvg kwvg commented Apr 24, 2023

Purpose

After #5077, Dash is no longer tied to the its depends and can be built from distro-obtained dependencies as it was before. Work on re-aligning Dash's build system with Bitcoin's has been documented in https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/51. This PR aims to realign build documentation with upstream.

Notes

  • revert: revert dash#2323 (Update build documentation) is not a true revert as after dash#2323, backports were done (source), including but not limited to, documentation updates for OpenSSL removal, SQLite & libnatpmp introduction and formatting changes.

    That revert commit attempts to preserve the spirit of the backports done after it while reverting the depends-centric documentation changes but as a result, changes may be misattributed and so closer review is requested.

  • bison is a dependency needed for building depends (as visible here) but isn't required to build dash-qt if building from dependencies sourced from your distro's package manager.

    Despite that, bison has been retained as a dependency for now based on feedback.

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

linter complains https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4166362049 - contrib/install_db4.sh needs more work

@kwvg kwvg requested a review from UdjinM6 April 25, 2023 03:17
@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

Linter fails still

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

I lean towards saying we should make sure these docs work before merging in :)

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

rebasing to pull in 5394

@kwvg kwvg force-pushed the docs_restore branch 2 times, most recently from aba53c9 to 86d3ebd Compare May 27, 2023 17:23
@kwvg kwvg requested review from UdjinM6 and PastaPastaPasta May 27, 2023 17:25
@kwvg kwvg force-pushed the docs_restore branch 3 times, most recently from d243609 to c925ed8 Compare May 27, 2023 17:44
kwvg and others added 22 commits May 27, 2023 23:15
contains portions of:
- bitcoin@1ac454a
- bitcoin@3352da8
- bitcoin@fac86ac
- bitcoin@8c9b8a3

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, utACK

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 20 milestone May 27, 2023
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit c59c751 into dashpay:develop May 29, 2023
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

post-utACK merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants