Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Various small fixes #5425

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 12, 2023
Merged

fix: Various small fixes #5425

merged 10 commits into from
Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Jun 10, 2023

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Fix various issues/crashes. These commits are mostly tiny/trivial so I thought it might be a good idea to just dump them in one PR and merge w/o squashing. Feel free to suggest otherwise :)

What was done?

Pls see individual commits

How Has This Been Tested?

run tests, run qt

Breaking Changes

n/a

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 19.2 milestone Jun 10, 2023
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2023 23:50
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain why a3b41ab isn't a breaking change?

@UdjinM6
Copy link
Author

UdjinM6 commented Jun 11, 2023

Can you explain why a3b41ab isn't a breaking change?

Luckily, in both cases we never check for type/version in serialization of any underlying type for all the values hashed there, so serialization stays the same. And hashing isn't affected by type/version either. To confirm this, I reindexed on testnet with -assumevalid=0 using this branch (rebased on develop cc2479a) - no issues.

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for merging via merge commit

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 merged commit a99fd92 into dashpay:develop Jun 12, 2023
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 deleted the multi_fixes branch June 12, 2023 07:57
PastaPastaPasta pushed a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants