-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: remove mn_rr fork usage from functional test of EHF #6270
Conversation
test/functional/feature_mnehf.py
Outdated
self.log.info("activate MN_RR also by enabling spork 24") | ||
assert_equal(get_bip9_details(node, 'mn_rr')['status'], 'defined') | ||
self.log.info("Test spork 24 (EHF)") | ||
assert_equal(get_bip9_details(node, 'testdummy')['status'], 'defined') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
assert_equal(get_bip9_details(node, 'testdummy')['status'], 'defined') | |
self.check_fork('defined') |
should also drop
self.log.info(f"bip9: {get_bip9_details(node, 'mn_rr')}")
assert_equal(get_bip9_details(node, 'mn_rr')['status'], 'active')
at the end of the test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 056d869
nit: PR title is misleading
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 056d869
…ck - 6/n 9a9d0d5 feat: drop SPORK 24 (EHF) so far as this feature works on testnet / mainnet (Konstantin Akimov) da0dc06 perf: optimize feature_mnehf.py by generating less blocks (Konstantin Akimov) 0de3923 feat: bury fork mn_rr (masternode reward reallocation) (Konstantin Akimov) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented MN_RR is activated on mainnet: time to bury it! ## What was done? Hard-fork mn_rr is buried. Prior fixes are done here: #6270 and #6269 ## How Has This Been Tested? Run unit and functional tests ## Breaking Changes N/A ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: light ACK 9a9d0d5 PastaPastaPasta: utACK 9a9d0d5 Tree-SHA512: 73ea0ca1270f15f6f1193efbaf402d476c84e9a843af85b7eae3e40199f4c943ad40f58e062b8db20e1c5c69c1a85579ebaf0722f1044ee2e1a4e7f96c58e645
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Using mn_rr in feature_mnehf.py is a blocker for burying mn_rr fork.
What was done?
Removed useless conditions, uses testdummy fork instead mn_rr in ehf functional test.
How Has This Been Tested?
Run it
test/functional/feature_mnehf.py
Breaking Changes
N/A
Checklist: