feat(platform)!: add owner keys to identities, fixed verification of use of owner keys #2215
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
QuantumExplorer
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 24
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (45)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/v0/mod.rs (2)
7-11: LGTM: Method signature is well-defined. Consider adding documentation.The method signature is clear and appropriate for its purpose. The
pub(super)visibility correctly limits its use to the parent module.Consider adding documentation comments to describe the purpose of the method and its parameters. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
/// Generates an owner identity owner key (version 0) from the given public key address and key ID. /// /// # Parameters /// * `owner_public_key_address` - A 20-byte array representing the owner's public key address. /// * `key_id` - The unique identifier for the key. /// /// # Returns /// A Result containing the generated IdentityPublicKey or an Error if the operation fails. pub(super) fn get_owner_identity_owner_key_v0( owner_public_key_address: [u8; 20], key_id: KeyID, ) -> Result<IdentityPublicKey, Error> { // ... }
12-23: LGTM: Implementation is correct. Consider error handling and const values.The implementation correctly constructs an
IdentityPublicKeyV0instance with all required fields. However, there are a few points to consider:
Error Handling: The method always returns
Ok, potentially missing error cases. Consider if there are any situations where this method could fail and handle them appropriately.Const Values: Some of the field values (e.g.,
KeyType,Purpose,SecurityLevel) could be defined as const values at the module level for better maintainability.Vector Allocation: The
to_vec()call creates a new allocation. If performance is critical, consider usingBinaryData::from_slice(&owner_public_key_address)to avoid the allocation.Consider refactoring the code as follows:
const OWNER_KEY_TYPE: KeyType = KeyType::ECDSA_HASH160; const OWNER_PURPOSE: Purpose = Purpose::OWNER; const OWNER_SECURITY_LEVEL: SecurityLevel = SecurityLevel::CRITICAL; pub(super) fn get_owner_identity_owner_key_v0( owner_public_key_address: [u8; 20], key_id: KeyID, ) -> Result<IdentityPublicKey, Error> { IdentityPublicKeyV0 { id: key_id, key_type: OWNER_KEY_TYPE, purpose: OWNER_PURPOSE, security_level: OWNER_SECURITY_LEVEL, read_only: true, data: BinaryData::from_slice(&owner_public_key_address), disabled_at: None, contract_bounds: None, } .try_into() .map_err(|e| Error::IdentityPublicKeyConversionError(e.to_string())) }This refactoring introduces const values for better maintainability, uses
from_sliceto avoid allocation, and adds error handling for the conversion toIdentityPublicKey.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/v0/mod.rs (1)
28-30: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the increased visibility.The change to
pub(crate)visibility forget_owner_identifieris appropriate, allowing reuse within the crate while maintaining encapsulation. This modification doesn't introduce any apparent risks.Consider adding a brief documentation comment explaining the purpose of this method and why it's now
pub(crate). This will help other developers understand its intended use across the crate.+ /// Retrieves the owner identifier for a given masternode. + /// This method is made pub(crate) to allow reuse within the crate. pub(crate) fn get_owner_identifier( masternode: &MasternodeListItem, ) -> Result<Identifier, Error> {packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/v1/mod.rs (1)
9-33: LGTM: Well-structured implementation with good error handling.The
create_owner_identity_v1method is implemented correctly and follows a logical flow. It properly uses helper methods to create and populate theIdentityobject. The use ofResult<Identity, Error>for the return type ensures proper error handling.Consider adding documentation comments (///) to explain the purpose of this method and its parameters. This would improve code readability and maintainability.
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/methods/v0/mod.rs (2)
19-24: Approve changes toPreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawalenum with suggestions.The renaming of enum variants from "Master" to "Owner" improves clarity and better represents the key's purpose. The reordering of preferences in
TransferPreferredis noted.Consider adding inline documentation to each variant to explain the new order of preference, especially for
TransferPreferred. This will help developers understand the implications of choosing each option.Example:
/// Use the transfer key, then the owner key TransferPreferred,
Line range hint
1-45: Summary of changes and potential impact.The main changes in this file revolve around the
PreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawalenum. The renaming of variants from "Master" to "Owner" improves clarity and semantics. However, these changes, especially the reordering inTransferPreferred, may affect the behavior of systems using this enum.While the
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionMethodsV0trait remains unchanged, its implementation might need updates to align with the new enum structure. It's crucial to ensure that all code depending on this enum is updated accordingly and thoroughly tested to prevent any unintended behavior changes.Consider the following recommendations:
- Update all implementations and usages of
PreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawalacross the codebase.- Review and update relevant documentation to reflect these changes.
- Add comprehensive tests to verify the correct handling of the new enum variants, especially in edge cases.
- Consider adding a migration guide or deprecation warnings if this change affects public APIs.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-72: Summary: Enhanced protocol upgrade handling with additional context.The changes to
perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_changemethod improve its functionality by incorporatingPlatformStateandBlockInfo. This additional context allows for more precise handling of protocol-specific events during version transitions. The modifications are consistent and well-implemented throughout the file.Consider documenting the specific use cases for
platform_stateandblock_infoin the method's documentation to provide clarity on how these new parameters enhance the protocol upgrade process.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/estimation_costs/for_purpose_in_key_reference_tree/v0/mod.rs (2)
48-48: LGTM! Consider grouping similar purposes.The addition of
Purpose::OWNERwithApproximateElements(1)is consistent with the existing pattern and appears to be a logical extension of the functionality.Consider grouping purposes with the same
ApproximateElementsvalue together for better code organization:Purpose::TRANSFER | Purpose::SYSTEM | Purpose::VOTING | Purpose::OWNER => ApproximateElements(1),
62-62: LGTM! Consider grouping similar purposes.The addition of
Purpose::OWNERwithAllReference(1, KEY_REFERENCE_SIZE, None)is consistent with the existing pattern and appears to be a logical extension of the functionality.Consider grouping purposes with the same
AllReferencevalue together for better code organization:Purpose::TRANSFER | Purpose::SYSTEM | Purpose::VOTING | Purpose::OWNER => AllReference(1, KEY_REFERENCE_SIZE, None),packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/purpose.rs (3)
42-43: LGTM: New OWNER variant added correctlyThe
OWNERvariant has been added to thePurposeenum with the correct value and a clear documentation comment. This addition aligns with the PR objectives of adding owner keys to identities.Consider expanding the documentation comment slightly to provide more context:
/// This key is used to prove ownership of a masternode or evonode, enabling secure identity verification for node operators. OWNER = 6,
112-120: LGTM: full_range method updated correctlyThe
full_rangemethod has been properly updated to include the newOWNERvariant. The array size has been correctly adjusted, and the new variant is added at the end of the array.For improved maintainability, consider using the
strum::EnumItertrait to generate the full range automatically. This would prevent potential errors when adding new variants in the future. Here's an example implementation:use strum::IntoEnumIterator; impl Purpose { pub fn full_range() -> Vec<Purpose> { Purpose::iter().collect() } }Note that this changes the return type from an array to a
Vec, which might require updates in other parts of the codebase.
Action Required: Missing
OWNERVariant in Purpose CollectionsThe verification revealed that while the
OWNERvariant is correctly implemented and used in several locations, there are multiple instances where arrays or vectors ofPurposedo not includePurpose::OWNER. Specifically:
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/query/identity_based_queries/identities_contract_keys/v0/mod.rspackages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/v1/identity_signed.rspackages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/mod.rs- And others as detailed in the script output.
Please update these collections to include
Purpose::OWNERwhere appropriate to ensure full integration of the new variant.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-120: Summary: OWNER variant successfully added to Purpose enumThe changes in this file successfully implement the addition of the
OWNERvariant to thePurposeenum, which is used to prove ownership of a masternode or evonode. All necessary updates have been made consistently across the file, including:
- Import statement
- Enum definition
- From/TryFrom implementations
full_rangemethodThese changes align with the PR objectives and enhance the identity management capabilities of the system. The implementation is sound and maintains consistency with the existing code structure.
To ensure that these changes are reflected correctly throughout the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any areas of the codebase that might need attention due to the addition of the new
OWNERvariant.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new OWNER variant across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any hardcoded purpose values that might need updating echo "Checking for hardcoded purpose values:" rg --type rust '\bPurpose::\w+\s*=\s*\d+' -g '!**/purpose.rs' # Test 2: Verify that all match statements handling Purpose enum are exhaustive echo "Checking for non-exhaustive match statements on Purpose:" rg --type rust 'match.*Purpose.*\{(?s:.)*\}' -g '!**/purpose.rs' # Test 3: Check for any arrays or vectors of Purpose that might need updating echo "Checking for arrays or vectors of Purpose:" rg --type rust '\[Purpose::|vec!\[Purpose::' -g '!**/purpose.rs' # Test 4: Verify that the new OWNER variant is used where appropriate echo "Checking for usage of the new OWNER variant:" rg --type rust 'Purpose::OWNER'Length of output: 6542
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/public_key_in_creation/methods/validate_identity_public_keys_structure/v0/mod.rs (2)
Line range hint
22-35: Approved: Rename clarifies the context, consider updating documentation.The renaming of
ALLOWED_SECURITY_LEVELStoALLOWED_SECURITY_LEVELS_FOR_EXTERNALLY_ADDED_KEYSprovides more clarity about the specific use case of these security levels. This change improves code readability and maintainability.Consider updating any relevant documentation or comments that might reference this variable to reflect its new, more specific name.
Line range hint
122-145: Approved: Consistent usage of renamed variable, consider minor refactoring.The usage of the renamed
ALLOWED_SECURITY_LEVELS_FOR_EXTERNALLY_ADDED_KEYSvariable is correct and consistent with its new name. The functionality of the method remains unchanged, preserving the existing behavior.Consider extracting the security level validation logic into a separate method for improved readability. This would make the
validate_identity_public_keys_structure_v0method more concise and easier to understand. Here's a suggested refactoring:fn validate_security_level( identity_public_key: &IdentityPublicKeyInCreation ) -> Option<BasicError> { let allowed_security_levels = ALLOWED_SECURITY_LEVELS_FOR_EXTERNALLY_ADDED_KEYS .get(&identity_public_key.purpose()); match allowed_security_levels { Some(levels) if levels.contains(&identity_public_key.security_level()) => None, Some(levels) => Some( InvalidIdentityPublicKeySecurityLevelError::new( identity_public_key.id(), identity_public_key.purpose(), identity_public_key.security_level(), Some(levels.clone()), ).into() ), None => Some( InvalidIdentityPublicKeySecurityLevelError::new( identity_public_key.id(), identity_public_key.purpose(), identity_public_key.security_level(), None, ).into() ), } } // In the main method: let validation_errors = identity_public_keys_with_witness .iter() .filter_map(validate_security_level) .collect();This refactoring would make the code more modular and easier to maintain.
packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/codes.rs (1)
156-156: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The new error variant
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErroris well-integrated into the existing error handling system. It follows the naming convention and uses the appropriate error code range for Identity Errors.Consider adding a brief comment above this variant to explain the specific scenario it addresses. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
// Error for when a withdrawal output script is not allowed in combination with owner key signing Self::WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyError(_) => 10532,packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_abci_versions.rs (1)
203-203: LGTM. Consider updating documentation.The addition of the
identity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsfield to theDriveAbciStateTransitionValidationVersionsstruct is a good enhancement to the validation process for identity credit withdrawals. This new check ensures that the purpose of the state transition matches certain requirements, which could improve security or compliance.Consider updating the documentation to explain:
- The specific requirements that this new validation step checks.
- The potential impact on the system's behavior or security.
- Any necessary updates to related components or tests.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_update/mod.rs (1)
348-451: LGTM: Well-structured test for disallowing owner key addition.The new test function
test_identity_update_adding_owner_key_not_allowedis well-implemented and correctly verifies that adding an owner key during an identity update is not allowed. The test covers all necessary steps from setup to assertion and cleanup.Consider making the error assertion more specific:
assert_matches!( processing_result.execution_results().as_slice(), [StateTransitionExecutionResult::UnpaidConsensusError( ConsensusError::BasicError(BasicError::OwnerKeyAdditionNotAllowed) )] );This would ensure that the exact expected error is being thrown, making the test more robust against potential future changes in error handling.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/mod.rs (4)
384-456: LGTM: New test case for masternode credit withdrawal using withdrawal keyThis test case effectively verifies the creation of a withdrawal document for a masternode owner when signing with the withdrawal key. It's a valuable addition to ensure the correct behavior of the credit withdrawal process for masternodes.
Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of this test case for clarity.
458-530: LGTM: New test case for masternode credit withdrawal using owner keyThis test case effectively verifies the creation of a withdrawal document for a masternode owner when signing with the owner key. It complements the previous test case and ensures comprehensive coverage of masternode credit withdrawal scenarios.
Consider adding a comment explaining the difference between this test and the previous one (withdrawal key vs. owner key) for clarity.
613-690: LGTM: New error test case for invalid masternode credit withdrawalThis test case effectively verifies that the system correctly rejects a withdrawal attempt when a masternode owner tries to use a withdrawal address while signing with the owner key. It's an important negative test case that ensures the system enforces the correct rules for masternode withdrawals.
Consider adding a comment explaining why this scenario should fail, to provide context for future developers.
Line range hint
1-692: Overall assessment: Improved test coverage for masternode credit withdrawalsThe changes in this file significantly enhance the test coverage for masternode credit withdrawal scenarios. New test cases have been added to verify the behavior of withdrawals using both withdrawal and owner keys, as well as error cases. These additions will help ensure the robustness and correctness of the masternode credit withdrawal functionality.
Consider adding high-level comments to each test case to explain their purpose and the specific scenario they're testing. This will improve the maintainability of the test suite in the long run.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/key/fetch/mod.rs (2)
694-695: Improvement in key selection logicThe changes in the
new_all_current_keys_querymethod now usePurpose::searchable_purposes()instead of iterating through all purposes. This is a more efficient approach as it only considers searchable purposes for key requests.Consider adding a comment explaining why only searchable purposes are used, to improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
pub fn new_all_current_keys_query(identity_id: [u8; 32]) -> Self { let mut sec_btree_map = BTreeMap::new(); for security_level in 0..=SecurityLevel::last() as u8 { sec_btree_map.insert(security_level, CurrentKeyOfKindRequest); } let mut purpose_btree_map = BTreeMap::new(); + // Only consider searchable purposes for key requests for purpose in Purpose::searchable_purposes() { purpose_btree_map.insert(purpose as u8, sec_btree_map.clone()); } IdentityKeysRequest { identity_id, request_type: SearchKey(purpose_btree_map), limit: None, offset: None, } }
694-695: Consider adding a specific test fornew_all_current_keys_queryWhile the existing tests cover various scenarios, it would be beneficial to add a specific test for the
new_all_current_keys_querymethod. This test should verify that only searchable purposes are included in the generated query.Here's a suggested test case to add:
#[test] fn test_new_all_current_keys_query() { let identity_id = [0u8; 32]; let request = IdentityKeysRequest::new_all_current_keys_query(identity_id); if let KeyRequestType::SearchKey(purpose_map) = request.request_type { assert_eq!(purpose_map.len(), Purpose::searchable_purposes().len()); for purpose in Purpose::searchable_purposes() { assert!(purpose_map.contains_key(&(purpose as u8))); } } else { panic!("Expected SearchKey request type"); } }This test ensures that the query only includes searchable purposes and that all searchable purposes are present.
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs (2)
631-631: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new method.The addition of
get_owner_identity_owner_keymethod is consistent with the PR objective of adding owner keys to identities. This new functionality will allow retrieval of the owner key for a masternode's owner identity.Consider adding a brief documentation comment explaining the purpose and usage of this new method to improve code maintainability.
772-772: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new validation.The addition of
identity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsvalidation enhances the validation process for identity credit withdrawal state transitions. This new check ensures that the purpose of such transitions aligns with predefined requirements.Consider adding a brief documentation comment explaining the specific requirements this validation checks for and its importance in the identity credit withdrawal process. This will improve code clarity and maintainability.
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v2_test.rs (3)
632-632: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new method.The addition of
get_owner_identity_owner_keyis consistent with the PR objective of adding owner keys to identities. This new method will likely be used to retrieve the owner key of a masternode's owner identity.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this method and how it relates to the masternode identity update process.
773-773: LGTM. Consider adding documentation and tests for the new validation method.The addition of
identity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsenhances the validation process for identity credit withdrawals. This new method will likely be used to ensure that the purpose of an identity credit withdrawal state transition matches certain requirements.
- Consider adding a brief comment explaining the specific requirements this validation method checks for and why it's important.
- Ensure that appropriate unit tests are added to cover this new validation method.
Would you like assistance in drafting the documentation comment or creating unit tests for this new validation method?
Line range hint
1-1180: Summary: Additions enhance identity management and validation.The two additions to this file (
get_owner_identity_owner_keyandidentity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirements) enhance the platform's capabilities in terms of identity management and state transition validation. These changes are consistent with the file's structure and the PR's objectives.As the platform evolves, consider the following:
- Maintain clear documentation for each version change to aid in understanding the platform's evolution over time.
- Ensure that all new methods and validation checks have corresponding unit tests to maintain the platform's reliability.
- Consider implementing a changelog to track these version updates, which can be valuable for both developers and users of the platform.
packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/basic/identity/withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_key.rs (4)
15-15: Consider rephrasing the error message for clarityThe error message can be made clearer by adjusting the phrasing. For example:
#[error("Withdrawal output script is not allowed when signing with owner key {key_id}")]This slight change improves readability.
17-20: Add documentation comments to the error struct and its fieldsAdding doc comments (
///) to theWithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorstruct and its fields enhances code maintainability and helps other developers understand its purpose.
22-26: Fix grammatical issue in the commentIn the comment about field order, consider correcting the grammar for clarity:
-DO NOT CHANGE ORDER OF FIELDS WITHOUT INTRODUCING OF NEW VERSION +DO NOT CHANGE ORDER OF FIELDS WITHOUT INTRODUCING A NEW VERSION
28-43: Provide documentation for constructor and accessor methodsIncluding documentation comments for the
new,output_script, andkey_idmethods will improve code readability and assist others in using these methods correctly.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/mod.rs (1)
25-44: Add unit tests for the new methodThe new method
get_owner_identity_owner_keyshould have corresponding unit tests to ensure its functionality and prevent future regressions.Would you like assistance in generating the unit tests or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/v0/mod.rs (1)
37-44: Nitpick: Provide additional context in error messagesThe error added when the signing key's purpose is
OWNERcould include more contextual information to aid debugging. Including details such as the expected key purpose or relevant identifiers can help in tracing issues during validation.Consider enhancing the error creation as follows:
result.add_error( WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyError::new( output_script.clone(), signing_key.id(), + // Add any additional context if available ), );Ensure that the
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorsupports additional context if needed.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/v1/mod.rs (2)
25-34: Enhance function documentation for clarityThe function
update_owner_withdrawal_address_v1is complex and plays a crucial role in updating the withdrawal address for a masternode owner. Consider adding detailed Rust doc comments explaining:
- The purpose of the function.
- Detailed descriptions of each parameter.
- The expected behavior and any side effects.
- Possible error conditions.
This will improve readability and maintainability for other developers interacting with the codebase.
25-134: Add unit tests forupdate_owner_withdrawal_address_v1To ensure the correctness and robustness of the
update_owner_withdrawal_address_v1function, consider adding unit tests covering various scenarios:
- Updating the withdrawal address when there are no keys to disable.
- Re-enabling a previously disabled key that matches the new withdrawal address.
- Adding a new withdrawal key when the new address does not exist among existing keys.
- Error handling when the owner's identity keys are missing.
- Verifying that owner keys are not disabled inadvertently.
This will help catch potential bugs and ensure that future changes do not break existing functionality.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/v0/mod.rs (1)
122-125: Consider handling potential absence of keys without usingexpectUsing
.expect("there must be keys, we already checked")assumes that the prior check guarantees the presence of keys. For production robustness, consider handling this case withoutexpectto prevent potential panics.Apply this diff to handle the potential absence of keys gracefully:
let last_key_id = *old_owner_identity_keys .keys() .max() - .expect("there must be keys, we already checked"); + .unwrap_or_else(|| { + // Handle the unexpected absence of keys appropriately + // For example, log an error or return from the function + });packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/mod.rs (2)
110-120: UseIdentityPublicKey::newfor clearer key initializationThe initialization of
withdrawal_keycan be simplified using theIdentityPublicKey::newmethod for improved clarity.Apply this refactor to streamline the key creation:
-let withdrawal_key: IdentityPublicKey = IdentityPublicKeyV0 { - id: 0, - key_type: KeyType::ECDSA_HASH160, - purpose: Purpose::TRANSFER, - security_level: SecurityLevel::CRITICAL, - read_only: true, - data: BinaryData::new(payout_address.to_vec()), - disabled_at: None, - contract_bounds: None, -} -.into(); +let withdrawal_key = IdentityPublicKey::new( + 0, + KeyType::ECDSA_HASH160, + Purpose::TRANSFER, + SecurityLevel::CRITICAL, + true, + payout_address.to_vec(), +);Also applies to: 185-195, 259-269
150-156: Clarify arguments inupdate_owner_withdrawal_addresscallsAlign the arguments vertically to enhance readability and consistency.
Refactor the calls to
update_owner_withdrawal_address:platform .update_owner_withdrawal_address( - identity.id().to_buffer(), - [0; 20], - &block_info, - &transaction, - &mut drive_operations, - platform_version, + identity.id().to_buffer(), // owner_identifier + [0; 20], // new_withdrawal_address + &block_info, + &transaction, + &mut drive_operations, + platform_version, )Also applies to: 225-231, 299-305
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/v0/random.rs (1)
248-298: Add documentation comments to new functionsTo improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding Rust documentation comments (
///) to the new functionsrandom_owner_key_with_rngandrandom_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng. This will help other developers understand the purpose and usage of these functions.Apply this diff to add documentation:
+ /// Generates a random owner key with critical security level and read-only access. pub fn random_owner_key_with_rng( id: KeyID, rng: &mut StdRng, platform_version: &PlatformVersion, ) -> Result<(Self, Vec<u8>), ProtocolError> { // function body } + /// Generates a random masternode transfer key with critical security level and read-only access. pub fn random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng( id: KeyID, rng: &mut StdRng, platform_version: &PlatformVersion, ) -> Result<(Self, Vec<u8>), ProtocolError> { // function body }packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (1)
631-631: Consider Renamingget_owner_identity_owner_keyfor ClarityThe method name
get_owner_identity_owner_keycontains the word "owner" twice, which might be redundant. Consider renaming it toget_owner_identity_keyorget_owner_keyfor clarity and consistency with other methods likeget_owner_identity_withdrawal_key.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (2)
632-632: Consider renamingget_owner_identity_owner_keyfor clarityThe method name
get_owner_identity_owner_keymay be redundant due to the repeated use of "owner" and "identity". Consider simplifying the name to enhance readability, such asget_owner_identity_keyorget_owner_key.
773-773: Simplify the method name for better readabilityThe method name
identity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsis quite lengthy, which may impact readability and maintainability. Consider shortening it to improve clarity, such asvalidate_withdrawal_purpose_requirementsorcheck_withdrawal_purpose.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v3.rs (2)
Line range hint
199-206: Inconsistency between code and comments regarding upgrade thresholdThe comment indicates that a 51% voting threshold is required for the upgrade:
/// We are setting the requirement to 51% voting for this upgrade for it to take effect. /// This was done directly in ABCI. /// If we get between 51 and 67% we will have a chain stallHowever, the code sets
protocol_version_upgrade_percentage_neededto67:protocol_upgrade: DriveAbciProtocolUpgradeMethodVersions { check_for_desired_protocol_upgrade: 1, protocol_version_upgrade_percentage_needed: 67, },This discrepancy could lead to confusion about the actual required threshold for the protocol upgrade.
Suggested Action:
Update either the comment or the code to ensure they both reflect the correct voting threshold. If the intended threshold is 67%, modify the comment accordingly.
639-639: Add unit tests forget_owner_identity_owner_keyTo maintain code reliability and prevent future regressions, please ensure that unit tests are created for the new method
get_owner_identity_owner_key.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (44)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/core_types/validator/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/basic/basic_error.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/basic/identity/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/basic/identity/withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_key.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/codes.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/purpose.rs (6 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/random.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/v0/random.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/methods/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/v1/identity_signed.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/v1/v0_methods.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/public_key_in_creation/methods/validate_identity_public_keys_structure/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/engine/run_block_proposal/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/v1/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/v0/mod.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/v1/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/v0/mod.rs (5 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/processor/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/mod.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_update/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/estimation_costs/for_purpose_in_key_reference_tree/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/key/fetch/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/withdrawals.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_abci_versions.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v2_test.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v3.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v4.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/src/errors/consensus/consensus_error.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/purpose.rs (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/v0/mod.rs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/core_types/validator/v0/mod.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (83)
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/v1/identity_signed.rs (2)
21-21: Verify consistency of purpose requirement changeThe
purpose_requirementmethod has been updated to includePurpose::OWNERinstead ofPurpose::AUTHENTICATION. This change aligns with the PR objective of adding owner keys to identities.Please confirm:
- Does this change correctly implement the intended feature of adding owner keys to identities?
- Are there any other parts of the system that need to be updated to accommodate this change in purpose requirements?
- Has the authentication flow been adjusted to handle
Purpose::OWNERfor identity credit withdrawal transitions?To help verify the impact and consistency of this change, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of purpose requirements in the codebase # Test: Look for other uses of purpose requirements in the context of identity credit withdrawal rg --type rust -e "purpose_requirement.*identity.*credit.*withdrawal" -e "identity.*credit.*withdrawal.*purpose" # Test: Check for any remaining uses of Purpose::AUTHENTICATION that might need updating rg --type rust "Purpose::AUTHENTICATION"
15-17: Verify the intentionality of security level simplificationThe
security_level_requirementmethod has been simplified to always returnCRITICALregardless of the purpose. This change might have significant implications on the security model for identity credit withdrawal transitions.Please confirm:
- Is this simplification intentional?
- Does it align with the overall security design of the system?
- Are there any potential risks or edge cases that need to be considered with this change?
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script to check for other occurrences of security level checks in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Security level simplification confirmed
The
security_level_requirementmethod consistently returnsCRITICALfor identity credit withdrawal transitions, and no other security levels are used in this context. This simplification aligns with the current security model of the system.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other security level checks in the codebase # Test: Look for other uses of security levels in the context of identity credit withdrawal rg --type rust -e "security_level.*identity.*credit.*withdrawal" -e "identity.*credit.*withdrawal.*security_level"Length of output: 7570
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/v0/mod.rs (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports cover all necessary types and modules for the implemented functionality without any apparent redundancies.
1-24: Summary: Implementation aligns with PR objectives, with minor suggestions for improvement.The new
get_owner_identity_owner_key_v0method successfully implements the feature of adding owner keys to identities, aligning with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured and follows Rust best practices.Consider implementing the suggested improvements:
- Add method documentation for better clarity.
- Introduce const values for better maintainability.
- Optimize the
BinaryDatacreation to avoid unnecessary allocation.- Implement proper error handling for the
IdentityPublicKeyconversion.These changes will enhance the code's readability, maintainability, and robustness.
packages/wasm-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/purpose.rs (3)
18-19: LGTM: NewOWNERvariant added correctlyThe addition of the
OWNERvariant to thePurposeWasmenum is well-implemented. It follows the existing structure, uses the next sequential value (6), and includes a clear comment describing its purpose for masternode owners. This change aligns with the PR objective of adding owner keys to identities.
31-31: LGTM:From<Purpose>implementation updated correctlyThe
From<Purpose>implementation forPurposeWasmhas been correctly updated to include the newOWNERvariant. This ensures that the conversion betweenPurposeandPurposeWasmremains complete and accurate, maintaining consistency with the enum update.
18-19: Summary: Successfully implementedOWNERkey purposeThe changes in this file successfully implement the new
OWNERkey purpose for masternode owners. ThePurposeWasmenum has been extended with theOWNERvariant, and theFrom<Purpose>implementation has been updated accordingly. These changes are well-structured, consistent with the existing code, and align with the PR objective of adding owner keys to identities.To ensure completeness:
This script will help verify that the
OWNERpurpose is consistently implemented across the codebase and identify any potential areas that might need additional updates.Also applies to: 31-31
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
OWNERkey purpose is consistently implementedThe
OWNERkey purpose has been successfully implemented across the codebase. No inconsistencies or outstanding issues were detected in enum definitions, match statements, or related annotations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the OWNER purpose is consistently implemented across the codebase # Check for OWNER in other relevant enum definitions echo "Checking for OWNER in other enum definitions:" rg --type rust "enum.*Purpose" -A 10 | grep -i owner # Check for OWNER in match statements or other usages echo "Checking for OWNER in match statements and other usages:" rg --type rust "match.*Purpose" -A 10 | grep -i owner # Check for any TODOs or FIXMEs related to OWNER implementation echo "Checking for TODOs or FIXMEs related to OWNER implementation:" rg --type rust "(TODO|FIXME).*OWNER"Length of output: 1270
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/v1/mod.rs (2)
1-7: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and necessary.The import statements are concise and cover all the required types and traits for the implementation. They follow Rust conventions and are organized logically.
17-30: Verify helper methods and consider adding inline documentation.The implementation relies on several helper methods (
get_owner_identifier,get_owner_identity_withdrawal_key, andget_owner_identity_owner_key) which are not defined in this file. While this approach improves modularity, it's important to ensure these methods are correctly implemented and well-documented.Please run the following script to locate and review the implementations of these helper methods:
Consider adding inline comments to briefly explain what each helper method does, especially if their implementations are in different files. This would improve code readability without needing to navigate to their definitions.
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/methods/v0/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
29-45: Verify impact of enum changes ontry_from_identitymethod.The
PreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawalenum is used in thetry_from_identitymethod of theIdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionMethodsV0trait. While the method signature remains unchanged, the behavior might have been affected by the enum changes.Please ensure that the implementation of
try_from_identityhas been updated to handle the new enum variants correctly, especially the changed order inTransferPreferred.Run the following script to locate the implementation and related tests:
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/mod.rs (2)
6-7: LGTM: New imports added correctly.The new imports for
PlatformStateandBlockInfoare correctly added and necessary for the new parameters in the method signature.
58-59: LGTM: Method call updated correctly.The call to
perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change_v0has been correctly updated to include the newplatform_stateandblock_infoparameters. The order of the parameters matches the method signature.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/estimation_costs/for_purpose_in_key_reference_tree/v0/mod.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-76: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe changes to add support for
Purpose::OWNERin the estimation costs calculation are well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. Here's a summary of the review:
- The new
Purpose::OWNERhas been added to bothestimated_layer_countandestimated_layer_sizesmatch expressions.- The implementation treats owner keys similarly to transfer, system, and voting keys.
- Minor suggestions for code organization have been provided to group similar purposes together.
- A verification step has been requested to ensure consistent implementation of
Purpose::OWNERacross the entire codebase.Overall, the changes align well with the PR objectives of adding owner keys to identities. Once the verification step is completed and any necessary adjustments are made, this implementation should be ready for integration.
Line range hint
48-62: Verify consistency of OWNER purpose implementation across the codebase.The addition of
Purpose::OWNERaligns with the PR objectives of adding owner keys to identities. However, it's important to ensure that this new purpose is consistently implemented across the entire codebase.Please run the following script to check for any inconsistencies or missing implementations:
This script will help identify any areas where the
Purpose::OWNERmight need to be added or where its implementation might differ from other purposes.✅ Verification successful
Consistency of
Purpose::OWNERimplementation confirmed across the codebase.All relevant areas handle the
Purpose::OWNERsimilarly to other purposes, aligning with the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent implementation of Purpose::OWNER across the codebase # Search for all occurrences of Purpose enum echo "Occurrences of Purpose enum:" rg --type rust -n "enum Purpose" # Search for all match expressions on Purpose echo "\nMatch expressions on Purpose:" rg --type rust -n "match.*Purpose" # Search for specific handling of OWNER purpose echo "\nHandling of OWNER purpose:" rg --type rust -n "Purpose::OWNER" # Search for potential TODO comments related to OWNER purpose echo "\nPotential TODO comments for OWNER purpose:" rg --type rust -n "TODO.*OWNER"Length of output: 3635
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/purpose.rs (3)
1-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been properly updated to include the new
OWNERvariant, maintaining alphabetical order.
61-61: LGTM: From implementation updated correctlyThe
From<Purpose> for &'static [u8; 1]implementation has been correctly updated to include the newOWNERvariant with the corresponding byte value [6].
76-76: LGTM: TryFrom implementations updated correctlyThe
TryFrom<u8>andTryFrom<i32>implementations have been correctly updated to include the newOWNERvariant with the corresponding value 6. This ensures consistent conversion between the enum and numeric types.Also applies to: 92-92
packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/basic/identity/mod.rs (3)
66-66: LGTM. Module declaration is consistent.The new module declaration for
withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_keyis consistent with the module's structure and corresponds to the public export added earlier. This change properly integrates the new error type into the module.
32-32: Overall, the changes look good and enhance error handling.The additions to this file are consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. They introduce a new error type related to withdrawal output scripts and owner key signing, which enhances the module's error handling capabilities for identity operations.
To ensure full integration:
- Verify that the new error type is properly implemented in its corresponding file.
- Update any relevant documentation to reflect this new error condition.
- Consider adding unit tests to cover scenarios where this new error might be thrown.
Please run the following script to check for usage of the new error type:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new error type in the codebase # Test: Search for usage of the new error type rg "WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKey" --type rustAlso applies to: 66-66
32-32: LGTM. Verify the new error type implementation.The new public export for
withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_keyis consistent with the module's structure and naming conventions. This addition enhances error handling for identity operations.To ensure the new error type is properly implemented, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
To ensure thorough verification of the new error type implementation, please run the corrected shell script below:
Verified: New error type implementation is correct.
The
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorstruct and its implementations are properly defined and integrated into the codebase. This addition enhances the error handling for identity operations as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new error type # Test: Check if the new error type file exists fd -t f withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_key.rs # Test: Verify the content of the new error type file cat $(fd -t f withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_key.rs) | grep -E "struct|impl"Length of output: 3645
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new error type # Test: Check if the new error type file exists fd -t f withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_key.rs # Test: Verify the content of the new error type file grep -E "struct|impl" packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/basic/identity/withdrawal_output_script_not_allowed_when_signing_with_owner_key.rsLength of output: 576
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/mod.rs (1)
7-8: Improved clarity in module naming and added new functionality.The changes to the module declarations enhance the specificity of the owner identity key handling:
- Renaming
get_owner_identity_keytoget_owner_identity_owner_keyprovides a clearer indication of the module's purpose.- Adding
get_owner_identity_withdrawal_keyintroduces new functionality for handling withdrawal keys.These modifications align well with the PR objective of adding owner keys to identities.
To ensure these changes are properly integrated, please run the following script:
Consider updating or uncommenting the tests at the bottom of this file if they are still relevant to the current implementation. This will ensure that the new functionality is properly tested.
✅ Verification successful
Verified module declarations and renaming.
The new modules
get_owner_identity_owner_keyandget_owner_identity_withdrawal_keyare properly declared, and there are no lingering references to the old module nameget_owner_identity_key.If these modules are intended for immediate use, please ensure they are integrated accordingly. Otherwise, the current changes align with the PR objectives.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new module declarations and their usage # Test 1: Check if the new modules are properly declared rg --type rust "mod get_owner_identity_owner_key;" packages/rs-drive-abci/src/ rg --type rust "mod get_owner_identity_withdrawal_key;" packages/rs-drive-abci/src/ # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old module name rg --type rust "get_owner_identity_key" packages/rs-drive-abci/src/ # Test 3: Check for usage of the new modules rg --type rust "use .*get_owner_identity_owner_key" packages/rs-drive-abci/src/ rg --type rust "use .*get_owner_identity_withdrawal_key" packages/rs-drive-abci/src/Length of output: 692
packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/withdrawals.rs (2)
Line range hint
76-271: LGTM: Consistent usage ofget_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path_vec().The implementation correctly uses
get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path_vec()for operations involving broadcasted withdrawal transactions. This is consistent with the import changes.
Line range hint
1-271: Suggestion: Thoroughly test withdrawal operations.While the changes appear consistent, the removal of
get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_pathin favor ofget_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path_vecmight subtly affect the behavior of withdrawal operations. Please ensure that comprehensive tests are in place to verify that all withdrawal operations, especially those involving broadcasted transactions, continue to function as expected.To assist with this verification, consider running the following script to identify relevant test files:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify test files related to withdrawal operations # Test: Find test files that might need updating or additional coverage rg --type rust -l 'withdrawal.*test' packages/rs-drive/src/Would you like assistance in reviewing or expanding the test coverage for these operations?
packages/rs-dpp/src/errors/consensus/basic/basic_error.rs (3)
55-55: LGTM: New error type imported correctly.The
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorhas been properly imported. This import is necessary for the new error variant added to theBasicErrorenum.
Line range hint
1-424: Summary: New error variant added successfully.The changes in this file are minimal and focused:
- A new import for
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorhas been added.- The
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorvariant has been added to theBasicErrorenum.These changes maintain the existing structure of the file and follow the established patterns for error handling. The new error type expands the capabilities of the error handling system to cover a specific case related to withdrawal output scripts and owner key signing.
338-341: LGTM: New error variant added correctly.The new
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorvariant has been added correctly to theBasicErrorenum. It follows the existing pattern and maintains the structure of the enum.To ensure this new error is properly utilized, let's check for its usage in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: New error variant is properly utilized throughout the codebase.
The
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErroris consistently used across multiple modules, ensuring it is correctly integrated and leveraged where necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the new error variant rg "WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyError" --type rustLength of output: 3059
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_abci_versions.rs (1)
251-251: LGTM. Verify integration with related components.The addition of the
get_owner_identity_owner_keyfield to theDriveAbciMasternodeIdentitiesUpdatesMethodVersionsstruct is a good enhancement for managing masternode identities. This new method for retrieving the owner key of an owner identity aligns well with the existing structure and could improve ownership verification processes.To ensure proper integration, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify:
- Where the new method is being used.
- Any existing tests that may need updating.
- Any pending tasks related to owner identity or keys that might be affected by this change.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_update/mod.rs (2)
119-119: LGTM: New imports for test function.The new imports are correctly added to support the functionality of the new test function
test_identity_update_adding_owner_key_not_allowed. They include necessary types for state transition processing, consensus errors, key pairs, and public key creation.Also applies to: 121-121, 123-123, 125-125, 135-135
Line range hint
1-451: Overall: Good addition of test coverage for identity updates.The changes in this file are well-implemented and focused. The new test function
test_identity_update_adding_owner_key_not_allowedadds valuable coverage to ensure that adding owner keys during identity updates is properly disallowed. The new imports are appropriate for the added functionality.No changes were made to existing implementations, maintaining the current behavior while enhancing test coverage. This is a positive contribution to the project's test suite.
packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-524: Verify usage ofKeytype and removal ofPath.The import change seems to be part of a cleanup or refactoring process. Let's ensure that:
- The
Keytype is used correctly in the file, particularly in theFetchManyimplementation forElement.- There are no remaining uses of
Paththat might cause compilation errors.To verify these points, let's run the following checks:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage of Key in FetchMany implementation for Element echo "Checking usage of Key in FetchMany implementation for Element:" rg -A 10 'impl FetchMany<Key, Elements> for Element' packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs # Check for any remaining usage of Path echo "Checking for any remaining usage of Path:" rg '\bPath\b' packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rsIf the
Keytype is used correctly and there are no remaining uses ofPath, this change can be considered safe and beneficial for code cleanliness.
34-34: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to include
Keyfromdrive::grovedb::query_result_typewhile removing the unusedPathimport. This change appears to be correct.Let's verify the usage of
Keyand ensurePathis not used anywhere in the file:✅ Verification successful
Verified: Import adjustments are correct.
The
Keyimport is appropriately used in the implementation, and there are no remaining references toPath. No issues found with the changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of Key and absence of Path echo "Checking usage of Key:" rg '\bKey\b' packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs echo "Checking for any remaining usage of Path:" rg '\bPath\b' packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rsLength of output: 473
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Comprehensive search for all usages of Key echo "Searching for all occurrences of Key in fetch_many.rs:" rg '\bKey\b' packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rs # Confirming no usage of Path remains echo "Confirming no remaining usage of Path in fetch_many.rs:" rg '\bPath\b' packages/rs-sdk/src/platform/fetch_many.rsLength of output: 444
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/mod.rs (2)
3-3: LGTM: New module import addedThe addition of the
signature_purpose_matches_requirementsmodule is consistent with the changes related to credit withdrawal functionality for masternode owners.
135-137: LGTM: New test helper function importedThe addition of the
setup_masternode_owner_identityfunction to the test imports is consistent with the new test cases for masternode owner identities.packages/wasm-dpp/src/errors/consensus/consensus_error.rs (3)
66-66: LGTM: New error type imported correctly.The new error type
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErroris correctly imported from thedpp::consensus::basic::identitymodule. This is consistent with the import style used for other error types in this file.
563-569: LGTM: New error type handled consistently.The new error type
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErroris handled consistently with other error types in thefrom_basic_errorfunction. It uses thegeneric_consensus_error!macro, which is the standard pattern for handling these types of errors in this file.
563-569: Verify the usage of the new error type in the codebase.The new error type
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErrorhas been correctly added to the error handling logic. To ensure it's being used appropriately, it would be beneficial to verify its usage across the codebase.Run the following script to check for occurrences of the new error type:
This will help ensure that the new error type is being used correctly and consistently throughout the project.
✅ Verification successful
Verified the usage of
WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyErroracross the codebase.The new error type is consistently and correctly utilized in relevant modules, ensuring proper error handling throughout the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyError # Search for the error type name in Rust files rg --type rust "WithdrawalOutputScriptNotAllowedWhenSigningWithOwnerKeyError" # Search for potential usages or references in comments rg --type rust "withdrawal.*output.*script.*owner.*key"Length of output: 3382
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/mod.rs (3)
155-156: Simplified pattern matching incall_getter_method_identity_signed!macroThe changes in these lines simplify the pattern matching for
StateTransition::IdentityCreateandStateTransition::IdentityTopUp. The_stvariable binding has been replaced with a wildcard_, which is a good practice when the bound variable is not used.- StateTransition::IdentityCreate(st) => None, - StateTransition::IdentityTopUp(st) => None, + StateTransition::IdentityCreate(_) => None, + StateTransition::IdentityTopUp(_) => None,This change improves code clarity by removing unused variable bindings.
168-169: Simplified pattern matching incall_getter_method_identity_signed!macro (second occurrence)Similar to the previous change, these lines also simplify the pattern matching for
StateTransition::IdentityCreateandStateTransition::IdentityTopUpin another part of the macro.- StateTransition::IdentityCreate(st) => None, - StateTransition::IdentityTopUp(st) => None, + StateTransition::IdentityCreate(_) => None, + StateTransition::IdentityTopUp(_) => None,This change is consistent with the previous modification and maintains a uniform coding style throughout the macro.
Line range hint
1-1000: Summary of changesThe modifications in this file are limited to the
call_getter_method_identity_signed!macro. The changes simplify the pattern matching forStateTransition::IdentityCreateandStateTransition::IdentityTopUpby replacing unused variable bindings with wildcards. These changes improve code clarity and maintain a consistent coding style.No other significant changes were observed in the file. The modifications are straightforward and do not introduce any new functionality or alter the existing behavior of the code.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/key/fetch/mod.rs (1)
694-695: Positive impact on efficiency without side effectsThe changes to
new_all_current_keys_querymethod improve efficiency by only considering searchable purposes. This modification doesn't introduce any breaking changes and doesn't require alterations in other parts of the code. It's a self-contained improvement that enhances the overall performance of identity key queries.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-1180: Summary: Changes enhance identity management and align with PR objectives.The two additions to this file (
get_owner_identity_owner_keymethod andidentity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsvalidation) enhance the platform's identity management capabilities. These changes are well-integrated into the existing structure and align with the PR objective of adding owner keys to identities.While the changes look good, consider adding documentation for both additions to improve code clarity and maintainability. Also, ensure that these new features are properly tested and that any related components are updated accordingly.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/mod.rs (3)
2-2: Addition ofv1moduleThe inclusion of
mod v1;correctly adds the new version module forcreate_owner_identity_v1.
42-42: Handle version 1 in the match statementThe match arm for version
1appropriately delegates toSelf::create_owner_identity_v1, ensuring the method handles the new version correctly.
45-45: Updateknown_versionsto include the new versionUpdating
known_versionsto[0, 1]in the error handling ensures accurate information is provided when an unknown version is encountered.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/mod.rs (6)
1-2: Module declaration is correct.The
pub(crate) mod v0;statement correctly declares the module for version 0 within the crate's scope.
3-10: Import statements are appropriate.All necessary modules and traits are properly imported, ensuring the code has access to required functionalities.
11-18: Trait definition is well-structured.The trait
IdentityCreditWithdrawalStateTransitionSignaturePurposeMatchesRequirementsValidationis correctly defined with the necessary method signature, facilitating versioned implementations.
20-27: Trait implementation is correctly set up.The trait is properly implemented for
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransition, ensuring the methodvalidate_signature_purpose_matches_requirementsis available for this struct.
28-37: Version dispatch logic is appropriate.The match statement accurately dispatches the validation method based on the platform version, calling
validate_signature_purpose_matches_requirements_v0for version 0.
38-43: Error handling for unknown versions is correct.The error handling correctly constructs an
UnknownVersionMismatcherror when an unrecognized platform version is encountered, providing useful debugging information.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/v0/mod.rs (2)
1-10: Approved: Correct imports and dependenciesThe use statements correctly import all necessary modules and dependencies required for the implementation. There are no unnecessary or missing imports.
11-18: Approved: Well-defined trait and method signatureThe trait
IdentityCreditWithdrawalStateTransitionSignaturePurposeMatchesRequirementsValidationV0is appropriately defined, and the methodvalidate_signature_purpose_matches_requirements_v0has a clear and concise signature that aligns with Rust conventions.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/v1/mod.rs (1)
99-99:⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect method name in tracing logs
Again, the
methodfield references"update_owner_withdrawal_address_v0"instead of"update_owner_withdrawal_address_v1".Apply this diff:
method = "update_owner_withdrawal_address_v0", + method = "update_owner_withdrawal_address_v1", "re-enabled withdrawal key to owner identity"Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/v1/v0_methods.rs (3)
103-105: Ensure correct usage of OWNER keys inOwnerOnlycaseThe
PreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawal::OwnerOnlycase now correctly retrieves keys withPurpose::OWNER. This change aligns with the intended functionality of restricting key selection to OWNER keys only.
68-70: Verify the shift from AUTHENTICATION to OWNER keys inOwnerPreferredcaseThe code now prioritizes
Purpose::OWNERkeys whenPreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawal::OwnerPreferredis used. Please ensure that this change is intentional and aligns with the overall key usage policies. Confirm that this does not adversely affect any functionalities that previously relied onPurpose::AUTHENTICATIONkeys.Run the following script to check for any remaining references to
PreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawal::MasterPreferredand ensure consistency:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find occurrences of obsolete enum variants related to key purposes. # Test: Search for the old enum variants. Expect: No matches found. rg 'PreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawal::MasterPreferred|PreferredKeyPurposeForSigningWithdrawal::MasterOnly' --type rust
96-96: Confirm the fallback to OWNER keys in key selection logicIn the
TransferPreferredandAnycases, the code now falls back toPurpose::OWNERkeys if no suitablePurpose::TRANSFERkeys are available or usable. Please verify that this fallback strategy is appropriate and does not introduce any security concerns, ensuring that OWNER keys are acceptable substitutes in these scenarios.Run the following script to ensure that the fallback logic is consistently applied throughout the codebase:
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/v0/mod.rs (7)
40-41: Addition ofplatform_stateandblock_infoparameters is appropriateThe inclusion of
platform_stateandblock_infoin the functionperform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change_v0allows access to necessary platform state and block information during protocol upgrades.
47-52: Updated function call totransition_to_version_4The function call now correctly passes
platform_state,block_info,transaction, andplatform_version, aligning with the updated signature and ensuring proper data flow.
74-75: Updated signature oftransition_to_version_4to accept new parametersAdding
platform_stateandblock_infoto the parameters oftransition_to_version_4is appropriate for accessing the required state and block details within the function.
98-101: Clear comments enhance code readabilityThe comments explaining the need to add all masternode owner keys provide clarity on the purpose of the subsequent code block.
101-148: Efficient iteration over masternodes to add new owner keysThe loop correctly iterates over all masternodes to update identities with new owner keys. The logic ensures that only masternodes with existing keys are processed.
118-121: Proper handling of masternodes without existing keysBy checking if
old_owner_identity_keysis empty and continuing the loop if so, the code avoids unnecessary processing for identities without keys.
133-139:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure logging
new_owner_keydoes not expose sensitive informationIn the
tracing::trace!macro,new_owner_keyis being logged. Please verify that this key does not contain sensitive or private information. If it does, consider omitting it from the logs or logging only non-sensitive parts.Run the following script to check where
new_owner_keyis used and ensure it is safe to log:✅ Verification successful
Logging
new_owner_keydoes not expose sensitive informationAfter reviewing the structure of
IdentityPublicKey, thenew_owner_keycontains non-sensitive information such as the owner's public key address. Therefore, logging it does not expose sensitive data.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of `new_owner_key` to verify it does not contain sensitive data. # Test: Search for `new_owner_key` assignments and usages. # Expect: Confirm that `new_owner_key` is safe to log. rg --type rust 'let new_owner_key = .*' -A 5Length of output: 1020
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of `get_owner_identity_owner_key` and its return type. # Locate the function definition rg --type rust 'fn get_owner_identity_owner_key' # Additionally, find all usages of `new_owner_key` to understand its handling rg --type rust 'new_owner_key'Length of output: 998
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the signature and implementation of `get_owner_identity_owner_key`. # Find the function definitions with context rg --type rust 'fn get_owner_identity_owner_key' -A 10 # Optionally, retrieve the return type and relevant struct definitions rg --type rust 'fn get_owner_identity_owner_key' -C 5Length of output: 7971
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definitions of `IdentityPublicKey` and `IdentityPublicKeyV0` structs to assess their contents. # Find the definition of `IdentityPublicKey` rg --type rust 'struct IdentityPublicKey' -A 15 # Find the definition of `IdentityPublicKeyV0` rg --type rust 'struct IdentityPublicKeyV0' -A 15Length of output: 19692
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/engine/run_block_proposal/mod.rs (4)
3-4: Approved: New Imports for Block State InformationThe added imports for
block_state_infoandBlockStateInfoV0Methodsare necessary for handling block state information and are correctly included.
6-6: Approved: Updated Epoch Info ImportsThe import of
EpochInfoV0GettersandEpochInfoV0Methodsensures access to the necessary methods for epoch information and is appropriately updated.
12-12: Approved: ImportingEpochfrom DPPImporting
Epochfromdpp::block::epochis required for creating newEpochinstances and is correctly added.
107-110: Approved: Creatingblock_state_infofrom Block ProposalThe creation of
block_state_infousingBlockStateInfoV0::from_block_proposalwithblock_proposalandlast_block_time_msis correctly implemented.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/mod.rs (4)
14-14: Addition of new modulev1The inclusion of
mod v1;correctly adds the new version module forupdate_owner_withdrawal_address.
65-72: Support for version 1 inupdate_owner_withdrawal_addressThe added match arm for version
1properly delegates toupdate_owner_withdrawal_address_v1, ensuring compatibility with the new version.
75-75: Update known versions in error handlingUpdating
known_versionsto include1ensures that the error message accurately reflects supported versions.
145-145: Reuse transactions where applicableStarting a new transaction immediately after adding the identity may not be necessary if the previous transaction can be reused.
Please confirm whether reusing the existing transaction is feasible. If so, it could simplify the code and improve efficiency.
Also applies to: 219-219, 293-293
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/v0/random.rs (2)
256-256: Verify theread_onlyflag settingIn both
random_owner_key_with_rng(line 256) andrandom_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng(line 282), theread_onlyflag is set totrue. Please verify if this aligns with the intended access level for owner and transfer keys. Typically, owner keys might require write permissions. Ensure this setting correctly reflects the security requirements.Also applies to: 282-282
4-4:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure all
Purposevariants are consistently handledWith the addition of
OWNERandTRANSFERto thePurposeenum (line 4), ensure that all match statements and logic handlingPurposevalues throughout the codebase are updated to include these new variants. This prevents potentialunreachable patternwarnings or runtime errors due to unhandled enum variants.You can run the following script to find all match statements on
Purpose:packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_public_key/random.rs (4)
470-498: Well-documented method for generating masternode owner keysThe function
random_masternode_owner_keyis well-documented and follows the existing conventions in the codebase. It correctly initializes the RNG based on the optional seed and delegates torandom_masternode_owner_key_with_rng.
500-538: Ensure consistency in error handlingThe method
random_masternode_owner_key_with_rngcorrectly handles unknown platform versions by returning aProtocolError::UnknownVersionMismatch. Ensure that the error messages and the method names used in the error are consistent across all similar methods for maintainability.
540-567: Well-implemented masternode transfer key generationThe function
random_masternode_transfer_keyis implemented properly, mirroring the structure of the owner key generation methods. The documentation is clear, and the use of RNG initialization aligns with the project's standards.
527-531: Verify that the invoked methods exist and are correctly namedPlease verify that
IdentityPublicKeyV0::random_owner_key_with_rngandIdentityPublicKeyV0::random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rngexist and are correctly named. This ensures that the code compiles without errors and that the correct methods are being called.To confirm, run the following script to search for the method definitions:
Also applies to: 598-603
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Methods Exist and are Correctly Named
The methods
IdentityPublicKeyV0::random_owner_key_with_rngandIdentityPublicKeyV0::random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rngexist and are correctly named.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the methods exist in the codebase. # Search for the definition of `random_owner_key_with_rng` in `IdentityPublicKeyV0` rg --type rust -A 5 -p 'impl IdentityPublicKeyV0' -e 'fn random_owner_key_with_rng' # Search for the definition of `random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng` in `IdentityPublicKeyV0` rg --type rust -A 5 -p 'impl IdentityPublicKeyV0' -e 'fn random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng'Length of output: 315
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correctly verify that the methods exist in the codebase using ripgrep. # Search for the implementation block of `IdentityPublicKeyV0` impl_block=$(rg --type rust 'impl\s+IdentityPublicKeyV0' --files) if [ -z "$impl_block" ]; then echo "Implementation block for IdentityPublicKeyV0 not found." exit 1 fi # Search for the definition of `random_owner_key_with_rng` within the implementation block rg --type rust 'fn\s+random_owner_key_with_rng' "$impl_block" # Search for the definition of `random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng` within the implementation block rg --type rust 'fn\s+random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng' "$impl_block"Length of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correctly verify that the methods exist in the codebase using ripgrep. # Search for files containing the implementation block of `IdentityPublicKeyV0` impl_files=$(rg --type rust 'impl\s+IdentityPublicKeyV0' --files-with-matches) if [ -z "$impl_files" ]; then echo "Implementation block for IdentityPublicKeyV0 not found." exit 1 fi # Iterate over each file containing the implementation block for file in $impl_files; do echo "Checking in file: $file" # Search for the definition of `random_owner_key_with_rng` within the file rg 'fn\s+random_owner_key_with_rng' "$file" # Search for the definition of `random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng` within the file rg 'fn\s+random_masternode_transfer_key_with_rng' "$file" doneLength of output: 1235
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/processor/v0/mod.rs (1)
32-32: Import statement added correctlyThe import for
IdentityCreditWithdrawalStateTransitionSignaturePurposeMatchesRequirementsValidationis appropriately added to support the new validation logic forIdentityCreditWithdrawal.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (1)
772-772: Addition of New Validation Method is AppropriateThe addition of
identity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsenhances the validation logic for identity credit withdrawal state transitions. This aligns with the existing structure and improves the robustness of the validation process.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v4.rs (3)
633-633: Verify method version numbering for consistencyThe method
get_owner_identity_owner_keyis added with version0. Please ensure that this version number is correct and consistent with other new methods in theDriveAbciMasternodeIdentitiesUpdatesMethodVersionsstruct.
637-642: Ensure consistent version numbering for new methodsThe methods
create_owner_identityandupdate_owner_withdrawal_addressare assigned version1, while other methods in the same struct are at version0. Please verify that the version numbers are accurate and consistently applied across all methods.
774-774: LGTMThe addition of
identity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementswith version0appears to be correct.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v3.rs (1)
780-780: Ensure validation logic is implemented foridentity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsThe addition of
identity_credit_withdrawal_state_transition_purpose_matches_requirementsintroduces new validation logic. Please verify that the corresponding implementation correctly enforces the intended requirements and that comprehensive unit tests are added to cover this new validation pathway.
...tform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/create_owner_identity/v1/mod.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ion/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/mod.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...m_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/mod.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/mod.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/processor/v0/mod.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/mod.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/mod.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/platform-test-suite/test/e2e/withdrawals.spec.js (1)
Line range hint
186-199: LGTM! Consider clarifying the test description.The changes to this test case align well with the PR objectives, particularly the focus on key purposes for identity verification. The updated error message correctly reflects the new validation rule requiring either a TRANSFER or OWNER purpose for the state transition.
Consider updating the test description to be more specific:
it('should not allow to create withdrawal with authentication key purpose (expecting TRANSFER or OWNER)', async () => {This change would make the test's intention even clearer to other developers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/v0/mod.rs (1)
12-19: Consider adding a shorter alias for the traitThe trait name
IdentityCreditWithdrawalStateTransitionSignaturePurposeMatchesRequirementsValidationV0is descriptive but very long. Consider adding a shorter alias to improve readability. For example:pub(super) trait SignaturePurposeValidationV0 = IdentityCreditWithdrawalStateTransitionSignaturePurposeMatchesRequirementsValidationV0;This allows using the shorter name
SignaturePurposeValidationV0in the rest of the code while maintaining the full name for documentation purposes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/v1/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/get_owner_identity_owner_key/mod.rs
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/core_based_updates/update_masternode_identities/update_owner_withdrawal_address/v1/mod.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/validation/state_transition/state_transitions/identity_credit_withdrawal/signature_purpose_matches_requirements/v0/mod.rs (4)
1-10: Import statements look goodThe import statements are relevant and necessary for the implementation. They cover all the required types and modules for error handling, identity management, and validation.
24-52: Implementation looks goodThe method implementation for
validate_signature_purpose_matches_requirements_v0is well-structured and correctly handles the validation logic. It properly checks for the output script, retrieves the signing key, and adds the appropriate error if the owner key is used incorrectly.
27-27: Verify the need for the unused_platform_versionparameterThe
_platform_versionparameter is currently unused in the method implementation. If this is intentional (e.g., for future use or consistency with other methods), consider adding a comment explaining why it's included. If it's not needed, you may want to remove it from the method signature.
1-53: Overall assessment: Good implementation with minor suggestionsThis new file implements the validation logic for identity credit withdrawal state transitions, specifically addressing the issue of owner keys signing withdrawals sent to a script payout address. The code is well-structured, follows Rust best practices, and correctly implements the required validation logic.
A few minor suggestions have been made to improve readability and clarity:
- Consider adding a shorter alias for the long trait name.
- Verify the need for the unused
_platform_versionparameter.These changes align well with the PR objectives and contribute to enhancing the security and correctness of the identity credit withdrawal process.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
There were 2 big issues, Masternodes didn't actually have their owner keys set. And owner keys could sign withdrawals that were sent to a script payout address.
What was done?
Introduced an Owner Key Purpose, when we change to protocol version 4, all active Masternodes will set this owner key purpose. All new masternodes/evonodes will have this set.
Normal identities can only withdraw with their transfer keys.
Masternode identities can withdraw with transfer keys anywhere. Or with the owner key, but only to their payout address.
How Has This Been Tested?
Added a lot of tests.
Breaking Changes
While these are breaking changes, they will only happen in Protocol V4.
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Purposeenum to include a newOWNERvariant for ownership verification.Bug Fixes
Documentation