Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dashmate): zero ssl certificate draft not saved #2297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

shumkov
Copy link
Member

@shumkov shumkov commented Oct 31, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

In case of error during ZeroSSL certificate validation, a draft certificate what we just created is not saving. Together with dashmate helper it creates an infinite loop of drafts spamming ZeroSSL API.

What was done?

  • Save config with new certificate once it's created.

How Has This Been Tested?

Running locally

Breaking Changes

None

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced SSL certificate management with new configuration parameters for improved persistence.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated comments and error handling in the certificate validation process for better clarity and guidance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces two new parameters, configFileRepository and configFile, to the obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory function, enhancing its ability to manage SSL certificate configurations. Additionally, the validateZeroSslCertificate function has updated comments for clarity and refined error handling logic, particularly distinguishing between certificate statuses. The overall functionality of both tasks remains unchanged, with no modifications to existing parameters or return types.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/dashmate/src/listr/tasks/ssl/zerossl/obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory.js Added configFileRepository and configFile parameters to obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory.
packages/dashmate/src/ssl/zerossl/validateZeroSslCertificateFactory.js Updated comments for clarity and refined error handling logic in validateZeroSslCertificate.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • QuantumExplorer
  • pshenmic

🐇 In the meadow where the bunnies play,
New tasks for SSL are here today!
With files to save and certs to check,
We hop along, what the heck!
Configuration’s now a breeze,
In our code, we dance with ease! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/dashmate/src/ssl/zerossl/validateZeroSslCertificateFactory.js (1)

116-118: Clarify the certificate state comments.

The comment "Certificate is already created" might be misleading here since the subsequent code checks for status !== 'issued'. This could cause confusion about the actual state of the certificate.

Consider updating the comments to be more precise:

-    // Certificate is already created at this point, so we just need to pass validation
-    // and download certificate file
+    // Certificate record exists at this point, but we need to verify its status
+    // and potentially download the certificate file if validation is complete
packages/dashmate/src/listr/tasks/ssl/zerossl/obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory.js (2)

Line range hint 173-201: Consider adding a maximum retry duration for verification

The current implementation has a retry prompt without a maximum duration limit. This could potentially lead to extended waiting times if there are persistent network or firewall issues.

Consider adding a timeout mechanism:

 task: async (ctx, task) => {
   let retry;
+  const startTime = Date.now();
+  const MAX_RETRY_DURATION = 30 * 60 * 1000; // 30 minutes
   do {
     try {
       await verifyDomain(ctx.certificate.id, ctx.apiKey);
     } catch (e) {
+      if (Date.now() - startTime > MAX_RETRY_DURATION) {
+        throw new Error('Certificate verification timed out after 30 minutes. Please verify your network configuration and try again.');
+      }
       if (ctx.noRetry !== true) {
         retry = await task.prompt({

Line range hint 211-235: Consider making certificate download retry parameters configurable

The current implementation uses hardcoded values for retry count (50) and interval (5000ms). These could be made configurable to accommodate different network conditions or API response times.

Consider extracting these as configurable parameters:

+const DEFAULT_DOWNLOAD_RETRY_COUNT = 50;
+const DEFAULT_DOWNLOAD_RETRY_INTERVAL = 5000;

 export default function obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory(
   generateCsr,
   generateKeyPair,
   createZeroSSLCertificate,
   verifyDomain,
   downloadCertificate,
   getCertificate,
   listCertificates,
   saveCertificateTask,
   verificationServer,
   homeDir,
   validateZeroSslCertificate,
   configFileRepository,
   configFile,
+  downloadRetryCount = DEFAULT_DOWNLOAD_RETRY_COUNT,
+  downloadRetryInterval = DEFAULT_DOWNLOAD_RETRY_INTERVAL,
 ) {
   // ... existing code ...
   
   task: async (ctx, task) => {
-    for (let retry = 0; retry <= 50; retry += 1) {
-      await wait(5000);
+    for (let retry = 0; retry <= downloadRetryCount; retry += 1) {
+      await wait(downloadRetryInterval);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d82eca and df5b068.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/dashmate/src/listr/tasks/ssl/zerossl/obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory.js (3 hunks)
  • packages/dashmate/src/ssl/zerossl/validateZeroSslCertificateFactory.js (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/dashmate/src/ssl/zerossl/validateZeroSslCertificateFactory.js (2)

Line range hint 107-114: LGTM! Clear error handling for pending and draft certificates.

The logic correctly identifies certificates in 'pending_validation' or 'draft' states and sets appropriate flags for further processing.


Line range hint 107-118: Verify integration with configuration saving mechanism.

While the validation logic is correct, let's verify that this validation flow properly integrates with the new configuration saving mechanism mentioned in the PR objectives.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about the certificate validation and configuration saving mechanisms:

Certificate validation is properly integrated with configuration saving

The code review shows that the validation flow is correctly integrated with the configuration saving mechanism through:

  • The saveCertificateTask which handles certificate persistence
  • The obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory which coordinates between validation and saving
  • The configFileRepository dependency injection in the certificate handling flow

The validation result in validateZeroSslCertificateFactory.js is properly consumed by these components to ensure certificates are only saved when valid, preventing the infinite loop scenario mentioned in the PR.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related configuration saving logic in the codebase
echo "Searching for configuration saving mechanism..."
rg -l "configFileRepository.*save.*certificate" 

# Search for potential infinite loop prevention
echo "Searching for draft certificate handling..."
rg "zerossl.*draft" --type js

Length of output: 283


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for configuration saving patterns
echo "Searching for certificate configuration patterns..."
rg -A 5 "saveCertificate|saveConfig.*certificate" --type js

# Search for ZeroSSL certificate handling
echo "Searching for ZeroSSL certificate handling..."
rg -A 5 "ZeroSslCertificate" --type js

# Look for files related to certificate configuration
echo "Finding certificate configuration files..."
fd -e js certificate

Length of output: 32885

packages/dashmate/src/listr/tasks/ssl/zerossl/obtainZeroSSLCertificateTaskFactory.js (1)

21-22: LGTM: Parameter additions are well-documented

The new parameters configFileRepository and configFile are properly added and documented in JSDoc, enabling the configuration persistence functionality needed to fix the draft certificate issue.

Also applies to: 37-38

@shumkov shumkov merged commit 453b30c into v1.4-dev Oct 31, 2024
23 checks passed
@shumkov shumkov deleted the fix/dashmate/draft-not-saved branch October 31, 2024 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants