Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix worker dashboard proxy #8528
Fix worker dashboard proxy #8528
Changes from all commits
0874a9b
4ad2bba
b0a24cb
389eb1e
f9cd3dc
c711856
b1fa686
049dcd0
649438f
28fd828
f2887a9
cc502f1
04c5415
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 57 in distributed/http/proxy.py
Codecov / codecov/patch
distributed/http/proxy.py#L56-L57
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be tested as well? (same for the change in lines 41-42)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure how to do this w/o some obvious mocking/assert calls as all our tests are ran on the same host, but okay. I'll look at that as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, small adjustment to a test to verify that bit of code. Note that exactly none of
GlobalProxyHandler
is directly tested but thru integration type testing so followed suit there. The test (test_dashboard_non_standard_ports
) will fail now w/o GlobalProxyHandler updatinghost_allowlist
. f9cd3dcThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like this is still not tested, but given that testing appears to be tricky, I consider this non-blocking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ya, the second one there, is only hit on a websocket connection unfortunately.