Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use chain to map from contig to chromosome #183

Open
ajo2995 opened this issue Sep 16, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

use chain to map from contig to chromosome #183

ajo2995 opened this issue Sep 16, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@ajo2995
Copy link
Contributor

ajo2995 commented Sep 16, 2015

I have a browser instance displaying annotations on individual contigs, but I'd like to do on-the-fly coordinate system mapping to the chromosome level pseudomolecules once they are defined. There may be multiple versions of the pseudomolecules, so I'd prefer to just update my chains file instead of all the annotations.

I created a chain file to map between contigs and chromosomes based on an AGP file, but features are only being displayed from the first contig in a chromosome on my chromosome level browser instance. Is this use of a mapping chain out scope?

@dasmoth
Copy link
Owner

dasmoth commented Sep 16, 2015

It's not quite what the system has been used for in the past, but seems entirely legitimate to me and sounds like you may have hit a bug. Certainly agree we should have a way of addressing use cases like this.

Time is currently limited but I should be able to have a look at this early next week. If you've got a couple of example files I could try, that would be super-helpful.

@ajo2995
Copy link
Contributor Author

ajo2995 commented Sep 16, 2015

I’ve set up a page with the contig level browser and the chromosome level browser.

brie.cshl.edu/chain_test/ http://brie.cshl.edu/chain_test/

brie.cshl.edu/chain_test/contig2chr.bed http://brie.cshl.edu/chain_test/contig2chr.bed is there for reference.

On Sep 16, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Thomas Down notifications@github.com wrote:

It's not quite what the system has been used for in the past, but seems entirely legitimate to me and sounds like you may have hit a bug. Certainly agree we should have a way of addressing use cases like this.

Time is currently limited but I should be able to have a look at this early next week. If you've got a couple of example files I could try, that would be super-helpful.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #183 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants