Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase DBFS copy buffer size #185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2023
Merged

Increase DBFS copy buffer size #185

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2023

Conversation

nfx
Copy link
Contributor

@nfx nfx commented Jun 19, 2023

Fix #131

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 66.66% and project coverage change: -0.02 ⚠️

Comparison is base (452c5c8) 53.30% compared to head (aa949d4) 53.28%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #185      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.30%   53.28%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines       18346    18344       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         9779     9775       -4     
- Misses       8567     8569       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
databricks/sdk/mixins/files.py 74.16% <66.66%> (-0.93%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@nfx nfx merged commit 990ab59 into main Jun 19, 2023
@nfx nfx deleted the fix/131 branch June 19, 2023 15:08
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Jun 21, 2023
nfx added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2023
* Added Sphinx documentation
([#184](#184),
[#191](#191),
[#183](#183),
[#193](#193)).
* Integrated with ReadTheDocs service
([#188](#188),
[#189](#189),
[#190](#190)).
* Create a deepcopy of config in api client
([#172](#172)).
* Fix client/secret auth
([#186](#186)).
* Increase DBFS copy buffer size
([#185](#185)).
* Move classes to other repository
([#192](#192)).
* Relax `requests` version upper bound to <3
([#138](#138)).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

w.dbfs.copy("file:/...","dbfs:/...") is much slower than using REST api with requests library
2 participants