Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add validation for path in databricks_repo #1702

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 31, 2022
Merged

Conversation

alexott
Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott commented Oct 28, 2022

It was reported by user that error message isn't understandable, so this PR improves this

It was reported by user that error message isn't understandable, so this PR improves this
@alexott alexott requested a review from a team October 28, 2022 06:57
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1702 (43fceac) into master (0bffcfe) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1702   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.99%   89.99%           
=======================================
  Files         141      141           
  Lines       11079    11086    +7     
=======================================
+ Hits         9970     9977    +7     
  Misses        707      707           
  Partials      402      402           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
repos/resource_repo.go 93.33% <100.00%> (+0.47%) ⬆️

@alexott alexott changed the title Add validation for Repos path Add validation for path in databricks_repo Oct 28, 2022
@nfx nfx requested a review from jengler October 31, 2022 16:35
@nfx nfx enabled auto-merge (squash) October 31, 2022 16:40
@nfx nfx merged commit 3f8e519 into master Oct 31, 2022
@nfx nfx deleted the repos-path-validation branch October 31, 2022 17:00
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2022
michael-berk pushed a commit to michael-berk/terraform-provider-databricks that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
It was reported by user that error message isn't understandable, so this PR improves this
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants