Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expose definiton attribute in databricks_cluster_policy data source #1834

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2022

Conversation

alexott
Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott commented Dec 9, 2022

No description provided.

@alexott alexott requested review from nfx and a team December 9, 2022 14:53
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1834 (9581fc1) into master (d4915dd) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1834   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.14%   90.15%           
=======================================
  Files         142      142           
  Lines       11358    11363    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        10239    10244    +5     
  Misses        711      711           
  Partials      408      408           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
policies/data_cluster_policy.go 92.00% <100.00%> (+2.00%) ⬆️

policies/data_cluster_policy.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nfx nfx enabled auto-merge (squash) December 12, 2022 15:39
@nfx nfx merged commit c822784 into master Dec 12, 2022
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2022
@nfx nfx deleted the expose-policy-definition branch January 25, 2023 15:26
michael-berk pushed a commit to michael-berk/terraform-provider-databricks that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…ce (databricks#1834)

* expose `definiton` attribute in `databricks_cluster_policy` data source
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants