Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc: fixed provider reference in example usage #1981

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2023
Merged

Doc: fixed provider reference in example usage #1981

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2023

Conversation

GBDBEN1
Copy link
Contributor

@GBDBEN1 GBDBEN1 commented Feb 6, 2023

this fixes #1980

Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@alexott
Copy link
Contributor

alexott commented Feb 6, 2023

just for future - for simple cases you can open PR directly without creating an issue for it

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1981 (75c243c) into master (44ced75) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1981   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.34%   90.34%           
=======================================
  Files         146      146           
  Lines       11901    11901           
=======================================
  Hits        10752    10752           
  Misses        742      742           
  Partials      407      407           

@nfx nfx changed the title #1980 Fixed provider reference in example usage Doc: fixed provider reference in example usage Feb 7, 2023
@nfx nfx merged commit fa2c48e into databricks:master Feb 7, 2023
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[DOC] Inconsistent documentation on databricks user creation
4 participants