Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add suppress diff to default_data_access_config_id in databricks_metastore #2111

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2023

Conversation

alexott
Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott commented Mar 14, 2023

No description provided.

@alexott alexott requested review from nkvuong and a team March 14, 2023 12:07
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2111 (8669d27) into master (9ca86a2) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2111   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.68%   89.68%           
=======================================
  Files         136      136           
  Lines       11105    11113    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits         9959     9967    +8     
  Misses        741      741           
  Partials      405      405           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
catalog/resource_metastore.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
exporter/importables.go 89.99% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
mws/resource_mws_networks.go 83.33% <100.00%> (-0.28%) ⬇️
mws/resource_mws_vpc_endpoint.go 90.47% <100.00%> (+1.00%) ⬆️
mws/resource_mws_workspaces.go 87.83% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@nkvuong nkvuong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nfx nfx merged commit a0921ab into master Mar 14, 2023
@nfx nfx deleted the suppress-diff-default_data_access_config_id branch March 14, 2023 14:35
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants