Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase coverage for common package #990

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2021
Merged

Increase coverage for common package #990

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2021

Conversation

nfx
Copy link
Contributor

@nfx nfx commented Dec 20, 2021

No description provided.

@nfx nfx added this to the v0.4.2 milestone Dec 20, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #990 (d6b92e0) into master (7d971f4) will increase coverage by 1.62%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #990      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.85%   87.47%   +1.62%     
==========================================
  Files         103      103              
  Lines        9301     9285      -16     
==========================================
+ Hits         7985     8122     +137     
+ Misses        799      678     -121     
+ Partials      517      485      -32     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
common/azure_auth.go 91.83% <100.00%> (+20.97%) ⬆️
common/reflect_resource.go 94.13% <100.00%> (+12.73%) ⬆️
common/azure_cli_auth.go 90.38% <0.00%> (+3.84%) ⬆️
exporter/context.go 87.60% <0.00%> (+7.88%) ⬆️
common/client.go 98.28% <0.00%> (+17.59%) ⬆️

@nfx nfx merged commit fdb6779 into master Dec 20, 2021
@nfx nfx deleted the coverage-common branch December 20, 2021 17:29
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2021
michael-berk pushed a commit to michael-berk/terraform-provider-databricks that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
* Increase coverage for `common` package
* Increase coverage for `exporter` package
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant