Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ingestion): ingest emails as empty if no ldap attribute #9433

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

tkdrahn
Copy link
Contributor

@tkdrahn tkdrahn commented Dec 11, 2023

fix(ingestion): ingest emails as empty if no ldap attribute

CorpUser emails are getting ingested as the LDAP username in cases where LDAP "email" attribute is not set, leading to invalid emails. Fix ingestion code to leave email field empty if there is no email attribute

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

Emails are getting ingested as the username in cases where "mail" attribute is not set, leading to invalid emails.  Fix ingestion code to leave email field empty if there is no mail attribute
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata label Dec 11, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsheth2 hsheth2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Not sure why the previous behavior was in there to begin with, but it definitely didn't really make sense

@hsheth2 hsheth2 added the merge-pending-ci A PR that has passed review and should be merged once CI is green. label Dec 28, 2023
@hsheth2
Copy link
Collaborator

hsheth2 commented Jan 4, 2024

@tkdrahn looks like the ldap integration tests are failing - could you run pytest tests/integration/ldap --update-golden-files to update the golden files?

There's also a small lint issue

@hsheth2 hsheth2 removed the merge-pending-ci A PR that has passed review and should be merged once CI is green. label Jan 4, 2024
@shirshanka shirshanka added the on-deck PR or Issue that will be reviewed and/or addressed by the DataHub Maintainers in future cycles label Jun 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 28, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@hsheth2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 27 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71e79ba and 74e8336.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@hsheth2 hsheth2 added the merge-pending-ci A PR that has passed review and should be merged once CI is green. label Jun 28, 2024
@anshbansal anshbansal merged commit 93616f7 into datahub-project:master Jul 1, 2024
58 of 82 checks passed
yoonhyejin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
Co-authored-by: Harshal Sheth <hsheth2@gmail.com>
aviv-julienjehannet pushed a commit to aviv-julienjehannet/datahub that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata merge-pending-ci A PR that has passed review and should be merged once CI is green. on-deck PR or Issue that will be reviewed and/or addressed by the DataHub Maintainers in future cycles
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants