-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ingest/looker): update for Looker query API breaking change #9865
Merged
hsheth2
merged 7 commits into
datahub-project:master
from
feldjay:update-looker-query-api
Feb 16, 2024
Merged
fix(ingest/looker): update for Looker query API breaking change #9865
hsheth2
merged 7 commits into
datahub-project:master
from
feldjay:update-looker-query-api
Feb 16, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
ingestion
PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata
community-contribution
PR or Issue raised by member(s) of DataHub Community
labels
Feb 15, 2024
hsheth2
reviewed
Feb 15, 2024
@@ -1199,7 +1199,9 @@ def extract_independent_looks(self) -> Iterable[MetadataWorkUnit]: | |||
logger.info(f"query_id is None for look {look.title}({look.id})") | |||
continue | |||
|
|||
query: Query = self.looker_api.get_query(look.query_id, query_fields) | |||
query: Query = self.looker_api.look(look.id, fields="query").query | |||
filtered_query_dict = {key: getattr(query, key) for key in query_fields if hasattr(query, key)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you add a comment explaining why we need this filtering step?
hsheth2
approved these changes
Feb 15, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@feldjay looks like there's some lint issues
|
hsheth2
changed the title
Fix (ingest): Update looker source for Looker query API breaking change
fix(ingest/looker): update for Looker query API breaking change
Feb 16, 2024
dushayntAW
pushed a commit
to dushayntAW/datahub
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
community-contribution
PR or Issue raised by member(s) of DataHub Community
ingestion
PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See patch notice here https://cloud.google.com/looker/docs/best-practices/query-id-update-instructions
Checklist