-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New spikeglx and probeinterface #169
New spikeglx and probeinterface #169
Conversation
Thanks for the discussion, @ttngu207. You have tested this with the meta file, and we will merge once we test these changes with the entire pipeline by triggering spike sorting. |
electrode_layouts = probe_geometry.build_npx_probe( | ||
**{**probe_params, **probe_type} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
electrode_layouts = probe_geometry.build_npx_probe( | |
**{**probe_params, **probe_type} | |
electrode_layouts = probe_geometry.build_npx_probe( | |
**probe_params, **probe_type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The suggested change would error out if there are duplicating keys between the two dictionaries.
The original approach is more robust in the sense that it would merge dictionaries.
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Yatsenko <dimitri@datajoint.com>
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Yatsenko <dimitri@datajoint.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ttngu207!
Fix #168