Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v1.0 release discussion #102

Open
1 of 6 tasks
rufuspollock opened this issue Nov 29, 2013 · 9 comments
Open
1 of 6 tasks

v1.0 release discussion #102

rufuspollock opened this issue Nov 29, 2013 · 9 comments

Comments

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Member

@andylolz @davidmiller @rossjones (and all others!)

We've now done a lot since the original prototype and even 0.1 "announce" and are starting to get something really quite nice (in large part thanks to efforts of @davidmiller and esp recently @andylolz!).

This is a discussion ticket on what are the priority things to do to make this really super awesome and ready for a v0.2 (or v1.0!). To get the ball rolling here's some suggestions:

General point (not a feature)

  • Documentation / tutorials Write blog post / documentation about all the new developments #85 (a bit more here would be really useful - perhaps a series of short blog posts)
  • Promote this relevant places (perhaps a guest post here or there ...) - perhaps get some big data juice by going on about how we can handle GB csvs because of our love node streaming :-)

Some non-essential extras

  • dedicated viewacsv app (perhaps separate app from this at viewacsv.okfnlabs.org with a view dedicated options)
@andylolz
Copy link
Collaborator

andylolz commented Dec 3, 2013

Arbitrary maps

Definitely. I think I have a good idea how to tackle this one now. Just need to get round to doing it!

Do we want to have datapipes-web or something if datapipes is core library plus cli (?)

Are you talking about git repos, or node modules? (or both?) I’m afraid I’m not really sure how the world of npm actually works…!

how we can handle GB csvs because of our love node streaming :-)

This would be great, but means we would defs need to close #15. Would be really good to do that for v0.2 anyway.

dedicated viewacsv app

Would be cool. I guess this relies on creating the datapipes node library first. Then we can create a new app that adds this as a dependency.

@andylolz
Copy link
Collaborator

andylolz commented Dec 5, 2013

At the risk of pulling loooads of stuff into spec for v0.2… It would also be really good to make the switch to binary-CSV (#93).

In fact, if we did all of these things, I think v1.0 may indeed be more appropriate.

@davidmiller
Copy link
Contributor

Also - support for a second input format. Whichever that may be.

On 5 December 2013 13:50, Andy Lulham notifications@github.com wrote:

At the risk of pulling loooads of stuff into spec for v0.2… It would also
be really good to make the switch to binary-CSV (#93#93
).

In fact, if we did all of these things, I think v1.0 may indeed be more
appropriate.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/102#issuecomment-29898589
.

Love regards etc

David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
07854 880 883

@andylolz
Copy link
Collaborator

andylolz commented Dec 5, 2013

Also - support for a second input format

This would mean that the currently trending “viewacsv” could be extended to “viewanrss” (or “viewajson” or whatever).

@davidmiller
Copy link
Contributor

For example, having this work: [http://datapipes.okfnlabs.org/json/head -n 5/html?url=https://api.github.com/repos/okfn/datapipes/issues](http://datapipes.okfnlabs.org/json/head -n 5/html?url=https://api.github.com/repos/okfn/datapipes/issues)

@andylolz
Copy link
Collaborator

andylolz commented Dec 5, 2013

Actually you know… outputting to json or rss would be straightforward. Does anyone want csv converted to rss?? csvfeeds.com?

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Member Author

@andylolz how are we doing here? is there anything i can / should hack on? What items should we really aim to close? I think a v1.0 / v0.2 release early in new year would be cool!

@rufuspollock rufuspollock changed the title v0.2 release discussion v1.0 release discussion Apr 5, 2014
@rufuspollock
Copy link
Member Author

Command line stuff basically done in dc7ea49

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Member Author

Renamed this issue to v1.0 discussion from v0.2 discussion ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants