Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
btrfs: unlock i_mutex after attempting to delete subvolume during send
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
commit 909e26d upstream.

Whenever the check for a send in progress introduced in commit
521e054 (btrfs: protect snapshots from deleting during send) is
hit, we return without unlocking inode->i_mutex. This is easy to see
with lockdep enabled:

[  +0.000059] ================================================
[  +0.000028] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
[  +0.000029] 4.0.0-rc5-00096-g3c435c1 raspberrypi#93 Not tainted
[  +0.000026] ------------------------------------------------
[  +0.000029] btrfs/211 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
[  +0.000029] 1 lock held by btrfs/211:
[  +0.000023]  #0:  (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8135b8df>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy+0x2df/0x7a0

Make sure we unlock it in the error path.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
osandov authored and gregkh committed May 13, 2015
1 parent bbc8c97 commit 8ab261b
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 1 deletion.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
"Attempt to delete subvolume %llu during send",
dest->root_key.objectid);
err = -EPERM;
goto out_dput;
goto out_unlock_inode;
}

d_invalidate(dentry);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2498,6 +2498,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
root_flags & ~BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
}
out_unlock_inode:
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
if (!err) {
shrink_dcache_sb(root->fs_info->sb);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 8ab261b

Please sign in to comment.