Adds stub method for process.on #81
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danieldelcore
force-pushed
the
process-on
branch
from
e313686 to
c5a9a73
Compare
danieldelcore
commented
Jun 30, 2023
davideicardi
requested changes
Jun 30, 2023
|
Sure thing! Done ✅ |
danieldelcore
commented
Jul 3, 2023
davideicardi
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://nodejs.org/api/process.html
When LPM encounters a dependency using
process.onlike so:It will throw the following error:
typeerror: process.on is not a functionI'm not sure if this is a suitable enough stub method so feel free to let me know if there's a better way to handle it. 😄