Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VN310 support? Dual GNSS #75

Open
pringithub opened this issue Jul 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

VN310 support? Dual GNSS #75

pringithub opened this issue Jul 27, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@pringithub
Copy link

Hello!

We have a VN310 and are wondering if this library could add Dual GNSS support as specified in the VN310 spec.
Thankfully, we are able to use the vn210.yaml file to get GPS data with a single antenna, but would like the option of dual antennae as well.

@pringithub
Copy link
Author

I also don't see any documentation for a 'compass' member variable in any of the rosmsgs, but I do see a reference to getting compass data in #57

@dawonn
Copy link
Owner

dawonn commented Jul 27, 2021 via email

@MattArceri
Copy link

MattArceri commented Jul 29, 2021

The yaw value reported by the VN-310 is aligned with North already. That direction is determined automatically using the dual GPS (as long as you setup the antenna positions properly already). You can just use the yaw value for heading. The compass status registers aren't needed for normal operation of the VN-310. Basically the VN-310 is already supported and has worked fine for me.
EDIT: To clarify, yaw=0 means the VN-310 is pointing North.

@umiklos
Copy link

umiklos commented Nov 14, 2023

@pringithub did you find a solution? We also want to use the dual GNSS with ROS1.

@MattArceri
Copy link

@umiklos When this issue was originally opened, I was already using this repository with the VN310 without any problems. There was never any update from @pringithub that made it clear what their specific issue was. I'd recommend just trying it out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants