Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add include_data_types flag to generate_source macro #76

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022

Conversation

GSokol
Copy link
Contributor

@GSokol GSokol commented Aug 17, 2022

This is a:

  • bug fix PR with no breaking changes — please ensure the base branch is main
  • new functionality — please ensure the base branch is the latest dev/ branch
  • a breaking change — please ensure the base branch is the latest dev/ branch

Description & motivation

Closes #75

Checklist

  • I have verified that these changes work locally
  • I have updated the README.md (if applicable)
  • I have added tests & descriptions to my models (and macros if applicable)
  • I have added an entry to CHANGELOG.md

@GSokol
Copy link
Contributor Author

GSokol commented Aug 24, 2022

@clrcrl or @matt-winkler, could you please take a look?

@GSokol
Copy link
Contributor Author

GSokol commented Aug 29, 2022

Maybe, @dbeatty10 could take a look?

Copy link
Contributor

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GSokol makes sense for codegen to have an option to include the optional data_type metadata field -- thanks for opening!

I added some comments on some implementation details for the integration tests for you to explore. Could you take a look and see if any of them work?

Your current implementation is reasonable with a small footprint, and we can move forward with it if my suggested ideas all end up being dead-ends.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
GSokol added 7 commits August 31, 2022 18:09
I've tried several approaches to generate the exact text, but it's not
working. So returninig tests to
dbt-labs@3a1267b
state.
@GSokol GSokol requested a review from dbeatty10 December 8, 2022 20:02
Copy link
Contributor

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your work on this @GSokol ! 🚀

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 merged commit c77d28e into dbt-labs:main Dec 21, 2022
jeremyholtzman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2023
* Add include_data_types flag to generate_source macro

* Add test for include_data_types

* Fix test_generate_source_all_args for Redshift

* Fix test_generate_source_all_args for Snowflake

* Fix int types test_generate_source_all_args for Snowflake

* Fix test_generate_source_all_args for BigQuery

* Fix typo

* Fix typo

* trying to avoid db-specific type defenitions

* Dummy fix

* Dummy fix

* Dummy fix

* Dummy fix

* Revert to initial schema

I've tried several approaches to generate the exact text, but it's not
working. So returninig tests to
3a1267b
state.

* Example of generating data types for columns

* Update changelog

* Remove comment [skip ci]

Co-authored-by: Doug Beatty <doug.beatty@dbtlabs.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add data_type to columns
2 participants