Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.9.9-slim-bullseye to slim-bullseye #4908

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

  • docker/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:slim-bullseye, as this image has only 47 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Some of the most important vulnerabilities in your base image include:

Severity Priority Score / 1000 Issue Exploit Maturity
critical severity 500 Integer Overflow or Wraparound
SNYK-DEBIAN11-EXPAT-2384928
No Known Exploit
critical severity 500 Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
SNYK-DEBIAN11-EXPAT-2403510
No Known Exploit
critical severity 500 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
SNYK-DEBIAN11-EXPAT-2403512
No Known Exploit
critical severity 500 Integer Overflow or Wraparound
SNYK-DEBIAN11-EXPAT-2406127
No Known Exploit
medium severity 514 CVE-2021-4160
SNYK-DEBIAN11-OPENSSL-2388380
No Known Exploit

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@snyk-bot snyk-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2022 08:51
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Mar 19, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide.

@leahwicz
Copy link
Contributor

@iknox-fa any reason to not do this change that comes to mind?

@leahwicz leahwicz requested review from iknox-fa and removed request for a team March 22, 2022 00:59
@leahwicz
Copy link
Contributor

leahwicz commented Apr 4, 2022

Fixed here #4963

@leahwicz leahwicz closed this Apr 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants