ddelnano / terraform-provider-mikrotik Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 29
Star 132

Code
Issues 11
Pull requests 4
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Issues: ddelnano/terraform-provider-mikrotik

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

11 Open 64 Closed

Author

Filter by author

Label

Filter by label

Use alt + click/return to exclude labels

or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR

Projects

Filter by project

Milestones

Filter by milestone

Assignee

Filter by who’s assigned

Assigned to nobody

Sort

Sort by

Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match

Most reactions

Issues list

support additional DNS static parameters client enhancement

New feature or request

provider

#230 opened Jun 13, 2024 by theblop

is it possible to use terraform provider in order to create/update address list enhancement

New feature or request

question

Further information is requested

#207 opened Oct 18, 2023 by gudge25

Support for NAT rules?

#197 opened Sep 18, 2023 by Tualua

Consider removing Deleter interface and always use .=id=X to delete item question

Further information is requested

#173 opened Jun 17, 2023 by maksym-nazarenko

1 task done

Question: DNS Type for resource

#54 opened Dec 6, 2021 by vavan11

Support BGP on RouterOS v7 enhancement

New feature or request

#52 opened Sep 8, 2021 by ddelnano

dhcp_lease resources generated by Terraformer generate invalid plans for v0.6.1 and later

#43 opened Jul 28, 2021 by ddelnano

Provider intermittently fails to initiate MikroTik API

#39 opened Jul 6, 2021 by peteleblond

Correct resource integration tests to treat failures appropriately, not by pretending the resource doens't exist

#38 opened May 12, 2021 by jdelnano

Extra client api call is necessary when updating a resource whose tf state id is not Mikrotik .id

#37 opened May 12, 2021 by jdelnano

freeze at apply and plan stages if we have many resources

#21 opened Oct 28, 2020 by eill

ProTip! Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly