Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

For record summary, use jurisdiction on offense, not on ciprs record #443

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

For record summary, use jurisdiction on offense, not on ciprs record #443

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

rebecca-draben
Copy link
Contributor

A ciprs record may have both district and superior court offenses

For record summary, use jurisdiction on offense, not on ciprs record
42fe875 
A ciprs record may have both district and superior court offenses
@rebecca-draben rebecca-draben merged commit 9c5342a into deardurham:master Oct 10, 2023
@rebecca-draben rebecca-draben deleted the fix_jurisdiction_defect branch October 10, 2023 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@georgehelman georgehelman georgehelman approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rebecca-draben @georgehelman