Added Robotics section and links

[VascoLopes]

Added a section to include blockchain papers related to Robotics, as this is a growing field and many papers that use and alter blockchain to work in robotic environments are surfacing.

Checklist for submitting a pull request to blockchain-papers:

• I have carefully read and comply with the Contributing Guidelines of this repo.
• I have searched the PRs of this repo and believe that this is not a duplicate.

[dionyziz]

I don't feel particularly strongly about including papers on the intersection between robotics. They seem of tangential interest at best. What do the other contributors think?

…

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 16:02 VascoLopes ***@***.***> wrote: Added a section to include blockchain papers related to Robotics, as this is a growing field and many papers that use and alter blockchain to work in robotic environments are surfacing. Checklist for submitting a pull request to blockchain-papers: - I have carefully *read and comply* with the Contributing Guidelines <https://github.com/decrypto-org/blockchain-papers/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md> of this repo. - I have *searched* the PRs <https://github.com/decrypto-org/blockchain-papers/pulls> of this repo and believe that this is not a duplicate. ------------------------------ You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: #82 Commit Summary - Update README.md - Update README.md - Update README.md - Update README.md - Update README.md - Update README.md File Changes - *M* README.md <https://github.com/decrypto-org/blockchain-papers/pull/82/files#diff-0> (11) Patch Links: - https://github.com/decrypto-org/blockchain-papers/pull/82.patch - https://github.com/decrypto-org/blockchain-papers/pull/82.diff — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#82>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEE6PGAL3NNSMW3ZP7VKJLPRBWPNANCNFSM4HG4V5ZA> .

[dimkarakostas]

Looking at the papers, it feels that Robotics could be best put under Applications, instead of a separate category; in this case, I wouldn't have a problem merging this PR. @dionyziz

Also @VascoLopes please squash your commits to a single commit, so that we keep a clean history of the repo.

[cnasikas]

I agree with @dimkarakostas that Robotics should be put under Applications. Nevertheless, I also don't feel strongly about adding the proposed papers.