Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improvement of deegree similarity tests used for WMS and WMTS #1210

Closed
tfr42 opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Improvement of deegree similarity tests used for WMS and WMTS #1210

tfr42 opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
WMS deegree Web Map Service WMTS deegree Web Map Tile Service

Comments

@tfr42
Copy link
Member

tfr42 commented Oct 8, 2021

It shall be checked if an library can be used to do the image comparision.
Additionaly the comparision of the images shall be more relaxed.
@tfr42 tfr42 added contributions welcome asking for contribution (time and money sponsor) funding welcome financial sponsoring wanted (money) WMS deegree Web Map Service WMTS deegree Web Map Tile Service labels Oct 8, 2021
@stephanr
Copy link
Member

stephanr commented Oct 8, 2021

Perhaps a library for image comparison for the website test could be an alternative.

A possible candidate for evaluation would be the following library.
https://github.com/romankh3/usage-image-comparison

@tfr42 tfr42 mentioned this issue Oct 8, 2021
Open
@tfr42
Copy link
Member Author

tfr42 commented Jan 6, 2022 •
edited
Loading

resolved with #1245 in v3.4.23

@tfr42 tfr42 closed this as completed Jan 6, 2022
@tfr42 tfr42 removed contributions welcome asking for contribution (time and money sponsor) funding welcome financial sponsoring wanted (money) labels Jan 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
WMS deegree Web Map Service WMTS deegree Web Map Tile Service
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tfr42 @stephanr