【deepin_V23_beta3】【一般】【正常】【发散测试】【内核】【6.6.7】惠普光影精灵8pro在控制中心-设置显示分辨率为1400*1050以下分辨率时，均黑屏 #42
Comments
|
请基于6.6.21进行验证 |
|
使用内测更新至3月22日，使用6.6.21的内核验证未通过，6.1.32的内核此操作功能正常。 |
|
The isusse comes after the commit : i915 load DMC file:adlp_dmc.bin version:2.20 Please Intel firmware maintainer help check why and fix plan. |
opsiff
pushed a commit
to opsiff/UOS-kernel
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2024
[ Upstream commit 97d833ceb27dc19f8777d63f90be4a27b5daeedf ]
ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM
(A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can
contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each
region (i.e., tc chain) is limited.
In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device
allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up
to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using
dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the
number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask
aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.
The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by
passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the
filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in
different TCAMs cannot share a mask.
The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the
filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will
periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by
looking at all the existing objects.
When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated
the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM /
C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to
move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids
two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if
one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the
A-TCAM.
The above can result in the following set of hints:
H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta
H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta
After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating
filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints
and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during
the transition.
Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the
new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of
H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and
create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive)
will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either
return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison
function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.
This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by
the library [1].
Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and
the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will
only return exact matches.
I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a
timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several
minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.
Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they
include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot
actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.
[1]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b deepin-community#42
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018
Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work
RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580
objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80
mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0
mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510
process_one_work+0x151/0x370
Fixes: 9069a38 ("lib: objagg: implement optimization hints assembly and use hints for object creation")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Zubkov <green@qrator.net>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit a642e820165d63bfb462f41a0ab1195393ec625f)
opsiff
pushed a commit
to opsiff/UOS-kernel
that referenced
this issue
Aug 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit 97d833ceb27dc19f8777d63f90be4a27b5daeedf ]
ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM
(A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can
contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each
region (i.e., tc chain) is limited.
In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device
allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up
to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using
dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the
number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask
aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.
The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by
passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the
filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in
different TCAMs cannot share a mask.
The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the
filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will
periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by
looking at all the existing objects.
When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated
the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM /
C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to
move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids
two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if
one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the
A-TCAM.
The above can result in the following set of hints:
H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta
H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta
After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating
filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints
and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during
the transition.
Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the
new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of
H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and
create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive)
will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either
return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison
function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.
This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by
the library [1].
Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and
the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will
only return exact matches.
I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a
timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several
minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.
Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they
include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot
actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.
[1]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b deepin-community#42
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018
Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work
RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580
objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80
mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0
mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510
process_one_work+0x151/0x370
Fixes: 9069a38 ("lib: objagg: implement optimization hints assembly and use hints for object creation")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Zubkov <green@qrator.net>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 029b2aab6cef0dcd981818862b6ec12a6000471e)
opsiff
pushed a commit
to opsiff/UOS-kernel
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2024
[ Upstream commit 97d833ceb27dc19f8777d63f90be4a27b5daeedf ]
ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM
(A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can
contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each
region (i.e., tc chain) is limited.
In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device
allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up
to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using
dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the
number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask
aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.
The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by
passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the
filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in
different TCAMs cannot share a mask.
The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the
filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will
periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by
looking at all the existing objects.
When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated
the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM /
C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to
move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids
two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if
one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the
A-TCAM.
The above can result in the following set of hints:
H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta
H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta
After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating
filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints
and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during
the transition.
Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the
new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of
H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and
create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive)
will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either
return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison
function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.
This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by
the library [1].
Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and
the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will
only return exact matches.
I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a
timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several
minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.
Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they
include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot
actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.
[1]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b deepin-community#42
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018
Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work
RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580
objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80
mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0
mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510
process_one_work+0x151/0x370
Fixes: 9069a38 ("lib: objagg: implement optimization hints assembly and use hints for object creation")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Zubkov <green@qrator.net>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0e59c2d22853266704e127915653598f7f104037)
Avenger-285714
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2024
[ Upstream commit 97d833ceb27dc19f8777d63f90be4a27b5daeedf ]
ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM
(A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can
contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each
region (i.e., tc chain) is limited.
In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device
allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up
to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using
dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the
number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask
aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.
The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by
passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the
filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in
different TCAMs cannot share a mask.
The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the
filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will
periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by
looking at all the existing objects.
When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated
the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM /
C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to
move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids
two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if
one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the
A-TCAM.
The above can result in the following set of hints:
H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta
H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta
After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating
filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints
and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during
the transition.
Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the
new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of
H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and
create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive)
will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either
return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison
function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.
This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by
the library [1].
Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and
the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will
only return exact matches.
I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a
timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several
minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.
Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they
include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot
actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.
[1]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018
Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work
RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580
objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80
mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0
mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510
process_one_work+0x151/0x370
Fixes: 9069a38 ("lib: objagg: implement optimization hints assembly and use hints for object creation")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Zubkov <green@qrator.net>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0e59c2d22853266704e127915653598f7f104037)
|
【环境】： 【结论】： |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
SUMMARY | 问题概要
惠普光影精灵8pro在控制中心-设置显示分辨率为1400*1050以下分辨率时，均黑屏
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS | 软件/系统版本信息
PRE-REQUIREMENT | 预置条件
STEPS TO REPRODUCE | 复现步骤
1.进入桌面环境，控制中心-设置显示分辨率为1400*1050以下分辨率
OBSERVED RESULT | 观察到的结果
EXPECTED RESULT | 期望的结果
惠普光影精灵8pro在控制中心-设置显示分辨率均成功，不会出现黑屏等异常现象
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | 额外补充
[设备信息]
设备: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d1xxx (650R1PA#AB2) Notebook
操作系统: Deepin 23 Community(Beta2) Linux version 6.6.7-amd64-desktop-hwe (uos@uos-PC) (gcc (Deepin 11.2.0-deepin2+rb2) 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Uos) 2.38) #23.01.00.21 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Dec 15 10:50:06 CST 2023
处理器: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-12700H (十四核 / 二十逻辑处理器)
主板: 8A25
内存: 8GB(M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 4800 MT/s)/8GB(M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 4800 MT/s)
显示适配器: GA106M [GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile / Max-Q]/Alder Lake-P Integrated Graphics Controller
音频适配器: Alder Lake PCH-P High Definition Audio Controller/GA106 High Definition Audio Controller/sofhdadsp /card1
存储设备: SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N (512 GB)
蓝牙: deepin-PC
网络适配器: Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi/RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
鼠标: SYNA32CC:00 06CB:CE7D Mouse (SYNA32CC:00 06CB:CE7D Mouse)/SYNA32CC:00 06CB:CE7D Touchpad (SYNA32CC:00 06CB:CE7D Touchpad)/DDE Cooperation Mouse (DDE Cooperation Mouse)/DDE Cooperation Touchpad (DDE Cooperation Touchpad)
键盘: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard (AT Translated Set 2 keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)/DDE Cooperation Keyboard (DDE Cooperation Keyboard)
显示设备: LCD Monitor(16.0 英寸(355mm X 199mm))
图像设备: HP Wide Vision HD Camera (Chicony Electronics HP Wide Vision HD Camera)
DM日志链接：https://filewh.uniontech.com/f/3db2be2efd0b404f855b/?dl=1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: